Infrastructure Development as a Prerequisite for Structural Change in Africa

Abstract

Structural change is seen by development economics theorists as a driver of sustained and sustainable economic growth. African countries that have understood this prioritize structural change policies in their national development programs in order to reduce poverty and promote employment through commodity-based industrialization. How does infrastructure development contribute to this process? The purpose of this paper is to answer this question by examining empirically whether the state of infrastructure development in Africa stimulates structural change, understood as the development of the manufacturing sector. After outlining the state of infrastructure quality in the region, and discussing some theoretical channels through which this relationship might pass, we estimate fixed effects models from 52 African countries over the period 2003-2018. Results which are robust to controlling for institutional dynamics and the natural resource curse hypothesis suggest that structural change in Africa is optimized with the development of infrastructure, particularly energy and information and communication technologies. Among other policy implications arising from these findings, the establishment of partnership projects with other developed countries in terms of superstructure for enhanced industrialization is recommended.

Sectoral Employment Shares Shape Economic Complexity: Empirical Evidence from African Countries

“…Indeed, the abundance of natural resources in Africa could undermine the development of highly productive sectors by reducing their competitiveness through the Dutch disease or lead to the deterioration of institutions, particularly by generating conflicts and corruption. Our results present some similarities with those of Yalta and Yalta (2021) and Malah Kuete and Asongou (2022).…”

“…Natural Resource Rents . Exploiting natural resources can generate conflict over the sharing of resulting revenue or lead to the neglect of productive sectors (Malah & Asongou, 2022). Thus, we expect a negative sign, as documented by the literature on the resource curse hypothesis.…”

Government infrastructure investment stimulation through booming natural resources: Evidence from a lower-middle-income country

“…Natural resources have a positive impact on sustainable development, but their impact depends on the quality of governance and the level of economic development [57]. Infrastructure and natural resource extraction can have a positive impact on economic growth [58][59][60]. Deficiencies in transportation infrastructure tend to inhibit the benefits of other infrastructure improvements.…”

Implications of Land Grabbing and Resource Curse for Sustainable Development Goal 2 in Africa: Can Globalization Be Blamed?

“…Land grabs, especially those allocated without due process, often lead to the displacement of people and the dispossession of their lands. As people are displaced or dispossessed of their lands, it becomes very easy to grab land, which in turn limits the capacity of local peasant farmers to productively produce food [21,37]. How could local peasant farmers engage in farming after the dispossession of their lands?…”