Infrastructure of data centers for transferring big data traffic: A survey research

Nejad, Emad Soltani; Majma, Mohammad Reza; Izadpanahi, Bardia; Natanzi, Seyed Bagher Hashemi; Navaei, Hamid Reza

doi:10.1109/ictck.2015.7582717

Cited by 7 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A typical otoscopic video clip is 1440 × 1080 × 24 bits/pixels per frame, with between 200 and 1000 frames, contrasted with a single frame for a still image. Transferring large video clips, even after compression, can provide a major barrier to care in settings where internet bandwidth is limited [11][12][13][14][15] . Moreover, storage of videos within electronic medical records is not currently streamlined, and replaying videos for patients/families for counseling purposes is tedious.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital otoscopy videos versus composite images: A reader study to compare the accuracy of ENT physicians

Binol

Niazi

Essig

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: With the increasing emphasis on developing effective telemedicine approaches in Otolaryngology, this study explored whether a single composite image stitched from a digital otoscopy video provides acceptable diagnostic information to make an accurate diagnosis, as compared with that provided by the full video. Methods: Five Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) physicians reviewed the same set of 78 digital otoscope eardrum videos from four eardrum conditions: normal, effusion, retraction, and tympanosclerosis, along with the composite images generated by a SelectStitch method that selectively uses video frames with computer-assisted selection, as well as a Stitch method that incorporates all the video frames. Participants provided a diagnosis for each item along with a rating of diagnostic confidence. Diagnostic accuracy for each pathology of SelectStitch was compared with accuracy when reviewing the entire video clip and when reviewing the Stitch image. Results: There were no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy for physicians reviewing SelectStitch images and full video clips, but both provided better diagnostic accuracy than Stitch images. The inter-reader agreement was moderate. Conclusion: Equal to using full video clips, composite images of eardrums generated by SelectStitch provided sufficient information for ENTs to make the correct diagnoses for most pathologies. These findings suggest that use of a composite eardrum image may be sufficient for telemedicine approaches to ear diagnosis, eliminating the need for storage and transmission of large video files, along with future applications for improved documentation in electronic medical record systems, patient/family counseling, and clinical training.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital otoscopy videos versus composite images: A reader study to compare the accuracy of ENT physicians

Binol

Niazi

Essig

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Implementation of Rule‐Based DDoS Solution in Software‐Defined Network

Tae,

Bijalwan,

Mutaher

2024

Creative Approaches Towards Development of Computing and Multidisciplinary IT Solutions for Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital Otoscopy Videos Versus Composite Images: A Reader Study to Compare the Accuracy of ENT Physicians

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives/Hypothesis With the increasing emphasis on developing effective telemedicine approaches in Otolaryngology, this study explored whether a single composite image stitched from a digital otoscopy video provides acceptable diagnostic information to make an accurate diagnosis, as compared with that provided by the full video. Study Design Diagnostic survey analysis. Methods Five Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) physicians reviewed the same set of 78 digital otoscope eardrum videos from four eardrum conditions: normal, effusion, retraction, and tympanosclerosis, along with the composite images generated by a SelectStitch method that selectively uses video frames with computer‐assisted selection, as well as a Stitch method that incorporates all the video frames. Participants provided a diagnosis for each item along with a rating of diagnostic confidence. Diagnostic accuracy for each pathology of SelectStitch was compared with accuracy when reviewing the entire video clip and when reviewing the Stitch image. Results There were no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy for physicians reviewing SelectStitch images and full video clips, but both provided better diagnostic accuracy than Stitch images. The inter‐reader agreement was moderate. Conclusions Equal to using full video clips, composite images of eardrums generated by SelectStitch provided sufficient information for ENTs to make the correct diagnoses for most pathologies. These findings suggest that use of a composite eardrum image may be sufficient for telemedicine approaches to ear diagnosis, eliminating the need for storage and transmission of large video files, along with future applications for improved documentation in electronic medical record systems, patient/family counseling, and clinical training. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E1668–E1676, 2021

show abstract

Infrastructure of data centers for transferring big data traffic: A survey research

Cited by 7 publications

References 17 publications

Digital otoscopy videos versus composite images: A reader study to compare the accuracy of ENT physicians

Digital otoscopy videos versus composite images: A reader study to compare the accuracy of ENT physicians

Implementation of Rule‐Based DDoS Solution in Software‐Defined Network

Digital Otoscopy Videos Versus Composite Images: A Reader Study to Compare the Accuracy of ENT Physicians

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About