Infrastructure Performance and Irrigation Water Governance in Genadendal, Western Cape, South Africa

Abstract

Disasters such as the 2015–2018 drought in South Africa usually negatively impact agricultural water, especially in smallholder farming systems. This study assessed the availability of irrigation water, performance of irrigation infrastructure, and water governance systems in Genadendal, Western Cape, with a focus on smallholder farmers. Data for streamflow, dam levels, and rainfall were acquired from water institutions and analysed using Microsoft Excel. The performance of the infrastructure and water governance were assessed based on the perceptions of smallholder farmers and key informants. A questionnaire was administered to eight smallholder farmers, followed by a focus group discussion with fifteen smallholder farmers. Interviews were conducted with eight key informants who worked in water-related institutions. Qualitative data from the interviews were analysed using thematic content analysis. The study showed adequate agricultural water resources during the 2015–2018 drought period for the smallholder farmers who relied on water from dams. However, smallholder farmers who relied on the Riviersonderend River experienced severe water shortages during the same period. The findings showed poor performance of irrigation water infrastructure due to inadequate maintenance. Lack of coordination among institutions, insufficient funding, political interference, fragmentation of roles and responsibilities, lack of human resources, and farmers’ lack of participation and commitment in water resource management all contributed to the dysfunctionality of irrigation water governance systems, leading to water insecurity. This study concludes that while agricultural water resources in Genadendal are sufficient, water governance systems need improvement in order to strengthen the water security status for smallholder farmers. This study recommends adequate funding for the operation and maintenance of infrastructure. Furthermore, water institutions need to support smallholder farmers with training skills in agricultural water management and infrastructure maintenance. Further studies are recommended to quantify the amount of water lost due to the poor performance of water infrastructure and to develop effective water governance in Genadendal. In addition, issues relating to crop varieties and changes in cropping intensity during drought periods need to be considered in future studies.

Does organizational support affect the governance performance of the farm irrigation system? Evidence from the Yellow River basin in China

“…(1) Dependent variables. Drawing on existing studies (Luo et al, 2019; Mugejo et al, 2022), this paper defines the governance performance of farm irrigation systems as their status, level and effect. The assessment of governance performance is conducted from two dimensions: supply level and management effectiveness.…”

The index system for the implementation effect evaluation of water-saving renovation of key medium-sized irrigation districts: A case study

“…At home and abroad, there have been many research achievements in the evaluation of irrigation districts and irrigation infrastructure [ 13 – 18 ]. At first, people paid attention to the evaluation of the performance and economic benefits of irrigation districts, mainly including the operation status, water use efficiency, production efficiency, etc.…”

Evaluation of water-user performance in smallholder irrigation schemes in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa: A stochastic meta-frontier analysis

“…Due to the noticeable underperformance of SIS, several studies have attempted to identify key issues, particularly relating to institutions, governance, and socioeconomic patterns (Gomo et al, 2014;Sinyolo et al, 2014;Dlangalala and Mudhara, 2020;Mwadzingeni et al, 2020;Mugejo et al, 2022). The studies considered various aspects such as the water security of water-users (Sinyolo et al, 2014), the assessment of local institutional actors on scheme performance (Mwadzingeni et al, 2020), farmer satisfaction of scheme performance (Gomo et al, 2014), assessment of performance of irrigation infrastructure and governance system (Mugejo et al, 2022), and the awareness of water governance across gender and intergenerational dimensions (Dlangalala and Mudhara, 2020). Furthermore, there are few studies that assessed performance of SIS using SFA such as Makombe et al (2017), Oulmane and Benmehala (2019), and Morais et al (2021).…”