1936
DOI: 10.1037/h0093410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition as a function of stimulus intensity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1940
1940
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of the prepulse on participants' responses to the call alert demonstrates a "real-life" application of physiological processes described in more than 80 years of startle response research (cf. Blumenthal et al, 2005;Graham, 1979;Peak, 1936Peak, , 1939. Specific stimulus parameters in the present study differ from those used in the bulk of the ASR literature; this was done to recreate the acoustic properties of the call alert signal as experienced by first responders.…”
Section: (A) (B) (C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the prepulse on participants' responses to the call alert demonstrates a "real-life" application of physiological processes described in more than 80 years of startle response research (cf. Blumenthal et al, 2005;Graham, 1979;Peak, 1936Peak, , 1939. Specific stimulus parameters in the present study differ from those used in the bulk of the ASR literature; this was done to recreate the acoustic properties of the call alert signal as experienced by first responders.…”
Section: (A) (B) (C)mentioning
confidence: 99%