2009
DOI: 10.3746/jkfn.2009.38.9.1265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibitory Effect of Dry-Heat Treatment and Chemical Sanitizers against Foodborne Pathogens Contaminated on the Surfaces of Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Da Silva Meira et al [22] evaluated the biofilm formation of three food industry-associated S. aureus isolates on SS and polypropylene surfaces, incubated in a vegetablebased medium at two temperatures (7 and 28°C/15 d), deducing that the biofilm development was favored at 28°C, without significant differences between the type of surface. Bae et al [35] found that populations of five food-borne pathogens including S. aureus formed biofilms with 8.8-9.3 and 9.4-10.3 log CFU/coupon on SS and polypropylene surfaces, respectively. Consequently, these isolates of S. aureus (SA-4E, SA-9, SA-13, and SA-19) have the ability to form biofilms on food contact surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Da Silva Meira et al [22] evaluated the biofilm formation of three food industry-associated S. aureus isolates on SS and polypropylene surfaces, incubated in a vegetablebased medium at two temperatures (7 and 28°C/15 d), deducing that the biofilm development was favored at 28°C, without significant differences between the type of surface. Bae et al [35] found that populations of five food-borne pathogens including S. aureus formed biofilms with 8.8-9.3 and 9.4-10.3 log CFU/coupon on SS and polypropylene surfaces, respectively. Consequently, these isolates of S. aureus (SA-4E, SA-9, SA-13, and SA-19) have the ability to form biofilms on food contact surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result was similar to a finding that E. coli decreased to below the satisfactory level of 500 CFU/100 cm 2 after spraying utensils made of SUS with 70% ethanol for 10 s (Kim, Jeon, & Han, ). Moreover, foodborne pathogens were inactivated to a greater extent by ethanol‐based sanitizers than a chlorine‐based one on an SUS surface (Bae et al, ; Lee, Cartwright, Grueser, & Pascall, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, foodborne pathogens were inactivated to a greater extent by ethanol-based sanitizers than a chlorine-based one on an SUS surface (Bae et al, 2009;Lee, Cartwright, Grueser, & Pascall, 2007).…”
Section: Efficacy Of Chemical Sanitizers Against S Aureus Attachmementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bae et al (19) reported that alcohol sanitizers were more effective than chlorine sanitizers for reducing E. coli O157:H7 within biofilms on the surface of stainless steel coupons. Similarly, log reductions of ≤1.50 were achieved when L. monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus on stainless steel were treated with 100 ppm chlorine for 5 min (20). In a study conducted by Lee et al (21), treatment of E. coli O157:H7 on media with aerosolized chlorine resulted in log reduction of 0.18.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%