Innovation, controversy, and consensus in traumatology.

Abstract

The author gratefully acknowledges members of the traumatic-stress mailing list for their passionate and thoughtful exchanges on topics covered in this article over the past two years, and Terry Bristol of the Institute for Science, Engineering, and Public Policy for interesting discussions regarding recent work by Larry Laudan and others in the philosophy of science. Helpful critical comments on a draft of this article were contributed by several This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.

Psychophysiological Studies of EMDR

“…its development was not derived through theoretical processes, and its mechanisms were not explained by theory (Baldwin, 1997;Poppen, 1995). Such critics forget that, at the time penicillin was discovered, the medical society lacked a theory that could explain its effects against a multitude of bacteria; it took about twenty years before the effects of penicillin on the bacterial cell wall was understood (Goldsworthy & McFarlane, 2002).…”

La polifonía en los foros de formación online

“…Algunos autores prefieren hablar de De y no de Computer Mediated Communication (CmC), debido a que la primera expresión focaliza más ajustadamente la naturaleza lingüística de los intercambios -como los individuos usan el lenguaje para intercambiar ideas-, más que en el medium o el canal por el cual son transferidos los mensajes. el texto electrónico es de una doble naturaleza: en sí es escrito pero se lee como si fuera una transcripción de un texto oral, por lo que ha sido llamado también conversación textual (Baldwin, 1996) y discurso escrito interactivo (Ferrara y otros, 1991).…”