2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation evaluation model for macro-construction sector companies: A study in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the complex system of construction, innovation is known as a key to the long-term success in firms of different sizes (Zubizarreta et al 2017;Turk 2016). Innovation may engender the fourth pillar to be integrated with the golden triangle of cost, time and quality (Nyström et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the complex system of construction, innovation is known as a key to the long-term success in firms of different sizes (Zubizarreta et al 2017;Turk 2016). Innovation may engender the fourth pillar to be integrated with the golden triangle of cost, time and quality (Nyström et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the overall high level of innovative potential and innovative activity of the big companies, existing advantages in its realization, scientists and experts [8] distinguish a number of problems in management of innovations, including big (holding) companies at the current stage, such as resistance to innovation of the management of these companies and external investors as a result to reaction on risks of the innovative activity, the problem of reorientation from "improve" to "breakthrough" innovations and overcome of the speed of response and the wish of big companies to consolidate existing positions instead of entrance on the new markets. In addition, the lack of innovative work force, who know the specific of management of the innovative process in complex structures, inefficiency of the system of further training and low level of innovative corporate culture in general as environment, where innovative activity of the holding is performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction industry in general is traditional (Bennett, 2013) and suffers from lack of innovation (Iranmanesh & Kamal, 2015). Innovation is key for the success of firms regardless of their size (Kyrgidou & Spyropoulou, 2013;Turk, 2016;Zubizarreta, Cuadrado, Iradi, García, & Orbe, 2017). Past research indicates that the adoption of new technologies and practices by the construction firms leads to improved firm performance (Russell, Tawiah, & Zoysa, 2006), increased range of capabilities, sustainable market share (El-Mashaleh, O'Brien, & Minchin Jr, 2006), and organizational competitive advantage (Salunke, Weerawardena, & McColl-Kennedy, 2011).…”
Section: Innovation In the Construction Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%