2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation generation in upstream and downstream business relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study contributes to the existing knowledge in three ways. First, this study responds to the call for more empirical research on innovation in the context of supply chains (Roy and Sivakumar, 2010;Roy et al, 2004). Second, this study systematically integrates different theoretical lenses and empirically tests a model that relates drivers and outcomes of innovation generation for suppliers in interorganizational context.…”
Section: Objectives and Context Of Studymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This study contributes to the existing knowledge in three ways. First, this study responds to the call for more empirical research on innovation in the context of supply chains (Roy and Sivakumar, 2010;Roy et al, 2004). Second, this study systematically integrates different theoretical lenses and empirically tests a model that relates drivers and outcomes of innovation generation for suppliers in interorganizational context.…”
Section: Objectives and Context Of Studymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The effects of customer acquisition and retention are mediated by customers' knowledge and firm's resource configuration, and the effect of customer knowledge and resource configuration will be amplified if a consistent strategy is implemented. Roy and Sivakumar (2010) addressed upstream and downstream relationships in the context of innovation generation, examined knowledge redundancy and relational embeddedness, and found knowledge redundancy between incremental and breakthrough innovation generation was stronger in upstream relationships than in downstream relationships. Additionally, they found the relationship of relational embeddedness in incremental innovation generation was stronger for upstream relationships, but the opposite was true for breakthrough innovation generation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of a three-echelon supply chain is a very typical also general model, which has a lot of research values in realistic operation. Research on the three-echelon supply chain is arising, Roy and Sivakumar (2010) said that firms can eas- * Corresponding author. Email: jiking@xmu.edu.cn ily implement upstream relationship knowledge exchange in product/service design modifications and innovations, but must further decipher downstream relationship knowledge exchange before including it in a design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In consequence, this paper examines critical aspects which foster innovative supplier contributions in collaborative actions between buyers and suppliers. Moreover, recent studies call for research on up-stream and down-stream relationships including supplier-supplier as well as supplier-buyer relationships (Choi & Krause, 2006;Roy & Sivakumar, 2010;Wu & Choi, 2005). In this manner, this study adds to supply chain literature by advancing the understanding of inter-supplier relationships in regards to supplier innovativeness at the OEM level.…”
Section: Theoretical Contributionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Even though previous research has analyzed antecedents of supplier innovativeness in buyersupplier collaborations Wagner & Bode, 2014), limited attention has been paid to up-stream and down-stream interactions in supply chains and its influence on innovativeness (Roy & Sivakumar, 2010). In addition, recent studies call for more empirical studies to develop a deeper understanding of supplier-supplier-buyer relationships (Wu & Choi, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%