2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Total biomass represents the whole insect community (Shortall et al 2009) and can be used as an indicator of ecosystem processes (Yang and Gratton 2014) and ecosystem function (Barnes et al 2016). Despite its power as a bioindicator, especially for energy flow and impacts on higher trophic levels (Stepanian et al 2020;Shaftel et al 2021), biomass alone might not always be a reliable predictor of biodiversity (Vereecken et al 2021). DNA metabarcoding is used for taxonomic identification up to species level.…”
Section: The Project Dina-diversity Of Insects In Nature Protected Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total biomass represents the whole insect community (Shortall et al 2009) and can be used as an indicator of ecosystem processes (Yang and Gratton 2014) and ecosystem function (Barnes et al 2016). Despite its power as a bioindicator, especially for energy flow and impacts on higher trophic levels (Stepanian et al 2020;Shaftel et al 2021), biomass alone might not always be a reliable predictor of biodiversity (Vereecken et al 2021). DNA metabarcoding is used for taxonomic identification up to species level.…”
Section: The Project Dina-diversity Of Insects In Nature Protected Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our dataset encompasses abundance records of wild bees obtained between 10.vi.2015 and 31.x.2020 through opportunistic observations, as well as through standardized, targeted biological surveys using a combination of pan traps and insect netting (transect walks) (Westphal et al, 2008;Normandin et al, 2017;Leclercq et al, unpublished;Weekers et al, unpublished). The methodology on the use of pan traps for bee surveys is detailed in Vereecken et al (2021).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For functional community structure approaches, we used the methodology described in Vereecken et al (2021): the taxonomic classification and functional traits of wild bee species in the Brussels-Capital Region used in this study are available in Table S1. The mixed matrix of qualitative and quantitative functional traits (between the columns "ITD" and "Diet.breadth") was converted into a Gower distance matrix with the gowdis function in the "FD" package (version 1.0-12) (Laliberté & Legendre 2010;Laliberté et al, 2015).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations