2022
DOI: 10.1007/13836_2022_106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insect Landscape Genomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While SNP markers have gained popularity in landscape genetic studies, microsatellite markers continue to be a prominent choice for studying population genetic structure (Chaulk & Keyghobadi, 2022; Hodel et al, 2016). SNPs do not require the design of specific primers in non‐model species, have a greater power to resolve fine‐scale structuring and provide information on adaptive selection (Dufresnes et al, 2023; Zimmerman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While SNP markers have gained popularity in landscape genetic studies, microsatellite markers continue to be a prominent choice for studying population genetic structure (Chaulk & Keyghobadi, 2022; Hodel et al, 2016). SNPs do not require the design of specific primers in non‐model species, have a greater power to resolve fine‐scale structuring and provide information on adaptive selection (Dufresnes et al, 2023; Zimmerman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, pollinator insect studies have been largely focussed on a limited number of taxa, with an underrepresentation of solitary bees and dipterans despite their prominent role in providing vital ecosystem services (Corbet et al, 1991; Doyle et al, 2020; Rader et al, 2016). A need exists for comprehensive investigations into species‐specific responses to human‐altered landscapes (Chaulk & Keyghobadi, 2022; Prendergast et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%