Insertion methods comparison for The Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway in children by novice

Chen, Y.; Bai, J.; Wang, Rurong

doi:10.1111/aas.13018

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our study showed that the SLIPA-3G had a similar insertion time, success rate and fiberoptic views as the LMAS in the hands of experienced anesthesiologists. Previous studies have found that the SLIPA is easier to insert for novices compared to other conventional SADs [ 18 – 20 ]. The SLIPA may therefore be useful as a rescue airway in resuscitation scenarios, where the operator may not be an anesthesiologist or have much experience with the insertion of SADs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the third-generation streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA-3G) with the laryngeal mask airway supreme for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study

Fan

et al. 2022

BMC Anesthesiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The third-generation streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA-3G) is a new-generation supraglottic airway device (SAD) that is non-cuffed and disposable, with a sealing pressure that varies dynamically with the airway pressure. This study compared the SLIPA-3G with the laryngeal mask airway supreme (LMAS) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Two hundred and twenty patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to either the SLIPA-3G group or the LMAS group. Data were collected on the patients’ hemodynamic parameters at different time points, ease of insertion, fiberoptic view, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) at different time points and SAD-related complications. Results The mean OLP immediately after device placement in the LMAS group was significantly higher than that of the SLIPA-3G group (31.34 ± 6.99 cmH2O vs.28.94 ± 6.01 cmH2O, P = 0.008, 95% CI 0.62–4.17). The OLPs of the two groups were not significantly different after the induction of a pneumoperitoneum until the end of surgery. The OLP increased gradually through the course of the operation in the SLIPA-3G group (P value = 0.035) but not in the LMAS group (P value = 0.945). There was no significant difference between the two groups in hemodynamic parameters, insertion time and success rate, fiberoptic view and complication rate. Conclusions The SLIPA-3G and LMAS were associated with comparable OLPs, hemodynamic parameters, ease of insertion, fiberoptic views and complication rates when used during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The SLIPA-3G can be used as an effective alternative to the LMAS in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the third-generation streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA-3G) with the laryngeal mask airway supreme for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study

Fan

et al. 2022

BMC Anesthesiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Insertion methods comparison for The Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway in children by novice

Abstract: The 120° bend improved SLIPA insertion when performed by novice, as reflected by higher insertion success rates and shorter insertion times, with no statistical differences in hemodynamic response to insertion or the incidence rates of complications between the two groups.

Cited by 1 publication

References 22 publications

Comparison of the third-generation streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA-3G) with the laryngeal mask airway supreme for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study

Comparison of the third-generation streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA-3G) with the laryngeal mask airway supreme for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About