2010
DOI: 10.1586/erm.10.52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights from the 2010 HIV Diagnostics Conference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the increased sensitivity of combination assays to detect AHIs relative to screening and supplemental tests (WB or immunofluorescent assays) currently in use, 6,27,28 new algorithms, such as those proposed at the 2010 HIV Diagnostics Conference, should be considered. [29][30] In one alternative HIV diagnostic algorithm, fourth-generation assays, or other similarly sensitive assays, can be used as the screening test, and when reactive, would be followed by an HIV-1/HIV-2 discriminatory assay, such as Multispot (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Redmond, WA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the increased sensitivity of combination assays to detect AHIs relative to screening and supplemental tests (WB or immunofluorescent assays) currently in use, 6,27,28 new algorithms, such as those proposed at the 2010 HIV Diagnostics Conference, should be considered. [29][30] In one alternative HIV diagnostic algorithm, fourth-generation assays, or other similarly sensitive assays, can be used as the screening test, and when reactive, would be followed by an HIV-1/HIV-2 discriminatory assay, such as Multispot (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Redmond, WA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%