2011
DOI: 10.6026/97320630007015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights from the analysis of conserved motifs and permitted amino acid exchanges in the human, the fly and the worm GPCR clusters

Abstract: G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) belong to biologically important and functionally diverse and largest super family of membrane proteins. GPCRs retain a characteristic membrane topology of seven alpha helices with three intracellular, three extracellular loops and flanking N' and C' terminal residues. Subtle differences do exist in the helix boundaries (TM-domain), loop lengths, sequence features such as conserved motifs, and substituting amino acid patterns and their physiochemical properties amongst these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it appears clearly from recent studies that the accuracy of the model greatly depends on the phylogenetic tree proximity of the template and the target [47]. Consequently, when considering (i) the remarks above, (ii) the conservation of the 7TM bundles in all GPCRs and the observed deformation of its helices [48], and (iii) the sequence conservation of several motifs [49] we decided to start our homology modeling phase using both phylogenetic data (for selecting the most suitable template) and helix predictions information (to align the TM helices sequences between the template and the target). Next the loops connecting the TM helices were added to the models obtained this way, considering also the constraint of the possible disulfide bridges [50, 51].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it appears clearly from recent studies that the accuracy of the model greatly depends on the phylogenetic tree proximity of the template and the target [47]. Consequently, when considering (i) the remarks above, (ii) the conservation of the 7TM bundles in all GPCRs and the observed deformation of its helices [48], and (iii) the sequence conservation of several motifs [49] we decided to start our homology modeling phase using both phylogenetic data (for selecting the most suitable template) and helix predictions information (to align the TM helices sequences between the template and the target). Next the loops connecting the TM helices were added to the models obtained this way, considering also the constraint of the possible disulfide bridges [50, 51].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-genome GPCR/OR cluster alignments were taken as an input (test set) to our in-house MOTIFS program [5] to identify residue conservation and substitutions in each position of the alignment. Here, conservation simply refers to an average of all possible pairwise sequences and the score is consulted from a normalized AA exchange matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once conserved amino acid patterns were recorded, the substituting AA residues were also identified and the properties for the AAS (like hydrophobic (@), aromatic (*), polar positive (+), polar negative (­) and polar uncharged ($)) were denoted by symbolic representation. The significant observation on preserved motifs and AAS in the helices and loop regions of the cross-genome GPCR cluster dataset was published recently [5] and the same principle was implemented in the package.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations