2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.03.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into grain boundary energy structure-property relationships by examining computed [1 0 0] disorientation axis grain boundaries in Nickel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using these BP fundamental zones, they found that GB energy in the Olmsted dataset varied smoothly for similar BP orientations of the same disorientation as a function of disorientation angle. This trend was later confirmed more generally by Erickson and Homer in their dataset of 346 [1 0 0] disorientation axis GBs [58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using these BP fundamental zones, they found that GB energy in the Olmsted dataset varied smoothly for similar BP orientations of the same disorientation as a function of disorientation angle. This trend was later confirmed more generally by Erickson and Homer in their dataset of 346 [1 0 0] disorientation axis GBs [58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This is readily solved when using CSL disorientations because the GB plane will be periodic for both grains if CSL lattice points are used when defining the supercell of the simulation. As such, all GBs used in this work are CSLs, but it should be noted that while low Σ CSLs are typically considered to be special, there is evidence against associating CSLs with special properties [58,[90][91][92]. Recent work showed that disorientation angle and BP are a better indicator of low GB energy than a low CSL Σ value [58].…”
Section: Gb Selection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All these calculations indicate that there is a simple linear relationship of GBEs between different metals having the same crystal structure. Furthermore, the functions that can quantitatively describes the GBE variations in the 5-D space of the five parameters defining GB structures were proposed for some FCC [ 24 , 31 ] and BCC [ 32 , 33 ] metals, based on the large GB sets. However, any variable of the five parameters is difficult to extract from the fitted functions for arbitrary GBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%