2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rppnen.2014.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inspiratory muscle training with threshold or incentive spirometry: Which is the most effective?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
40
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
40
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, a more detailed assessment system may be needed to define the differences in further studies. Moreover, in our study, the incentive spirometer Voldyne was used, as it is popular used in China so far, however, the device is unfortunately not the best way to improve respiratory muscle performances (28). Meanwhile, we intended to increase the exercise duration combining IMT and CRT during the 7 days to achieve the effect of "high-intensity", as in a relative short it is hardly to incrementally increase the workload.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, a more detailed assessment system may be needed to define the differences in further studies. Moreover, in our study, the incentive spirometer Voldyne was used, as it is popular used in China so far, however, the device is unfortunately not the best way to improve respiratory muscle performances (28). Meanwhile, we intended to increase the exercise duration combining IMT and CRT during the 7 days to achieve the effect of "high-intensity", as in a relative short it is hardly to incrementally increase the workload.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings answer the study's questions regarding the effectiveness of Threshold IMT® and POWERbreath plus® devices with healthy subjects who have minimal daily activity and the comparison between the two devices concerning their effectiveness. Inspiratory muscle strength increased significantly with the experimental groups after training period of four weeks (56 sessions) as it was applied by Paiva et al, [7]. In addition, Paiva et al, [7] studied the effectiveness of incentive spirometry (IS) and threshold on 40 healthy female subjects that confirmed significant improvement on MIP with Threshold group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Inspiratory muscle strength increased significantly with the experimental groups after training period of four weeks (56 sessions) as it was applied by Paiva et al, [7]. In addition, Paiva et al, [7] studied the effectiveness of incentive spirometry (IS) and threshold on 40 healthy female subjects that confirmed significant improvement on MIP with Threshold group. This finding proved that four weeks of training period is applicable to improve inspiratory muscle strength and it can be useful to train the inspiratory muscles and improve their strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The real efficiency of the IMT has still not been established. Moreover, the devices that might result in improved efficiency have not been identified (de Abreu, Rehder-Santos, Minatel, dos Santos, & Catai, 2017;Paiva et al, 2015). Hence, it is necessary to identify IMT-ideal patient populations and the optimal durations, frequencies, workloads and the parameters required for it (Adamopoulos et al, 2014;Wu et al, 2018), in larger clinical trials (Lin et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%