2019
DOI: 10.1504/ijtgm.2019.097940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional effects in development of regional innovational infrastructure

Abstract: Purpose-The authors try to determine the institutional effect in development of regional innovational infrastructure on the basis of comparing the data on dynamics and geographical distribution of various types of the innovational infrastructure-technological parks, industrial parks, innovational territorial clusters, and small innovational companies for with higher educational establishments in the Russian regions. Design/methodology/ approach-The authors made an attempt on determining the institutional effec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis allows concluding that imbalances appear among all groups of regions, which confirms the previously put forward hypothesis about the institutional conditionality of the choice of the type of infrastructure facilities. [16] The presence of the "life cycle" institutional effect is confirmed by an analysis of the dynamics of the quantitative characteristics of the economic entities representation belonging to various institutions of regional innovation infrastructure. [17] A common characteristic of the different institutions' dynamics of regional innovation infrastructure is the presence of the following phases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The analysis allows concluding that imbalances appear among all groups of regions, which confirms the previously put forward hypothesis about the institutional conditionality of the choice of the type of infrastructure facilities. [16] The presence of the "life cycle" institutional effect is confirmed by an analysis of the dynamics of the quantitative characteristics of the economic entities representation belonging to various institutions of regional innovation infrastructure. [17] A common characteristic of the different institutions' dynamics of regional innovation infrastructure is the presence of the following phases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Studying the projects of ASEAN countries, it is clear that CICPEC is clearly beneficial for them. Lyapina, I. indicated in her work institutional effects in development of regional innovational infrastructure (Lyapina, I. at al., 2019). For example, infrastructure projects may allow Laos to access the sea, eventually transforming it from a land-locked state to a state with access to the coast due the development of transport infrastructure.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2011, the Russian government has been actively implementing the following federal programs: the creation of SEZs, Territorial Development Zones (TDZs), Territories of Advanced Social and Economic Development (TASEDs) and Vladivostok Free Port (VFP). The diversity of the local economies explained the necessity in the implementation of these initiatives but with deteriorating infrastructure and decreasing overall business activity (Lyapina et al, 2019;Zaytsev, 2016). The Russian government aimed to create so-called regional 'points of growth' by creating a favourable investment climate throughout the FER and strived to avoid potentially large-scale negative consequences in case of failure of the experiment (Han, 2017;Minakir and Prokapalo, 2017).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%