2015
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional Logics and Interorganizational Learning in Technological Arenas: Evidence from Standard-Setting Organizations in the Mobile Handset Industry

Abstract: Institutional logics and inter-organizational learning in technological arenas: Evidence from standard setting organizations in the mobile handset industry. Organization Science, 26 (3). pp. 830-846. ISSN 1047-7039 Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/25399We recommend you cite the published version. The publisher's URL is: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0940Refereed: No (no note) Disclaimer UWE has obtained warranties from all depositors as to their title in the material deposited and as to their r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Internationally active companies represented in the SSO include big players such as Bosch, Siemens, and IBM, which are multinational companies. Since Vasudeva et al [98] find that firms' interorganizational learning within standardization is embedded in their macro-level country context, a replication of the study for other national SSOs, like DIN in Germany, would allow a further confirmation of the identified firm-level characteristics as drivers of firms' entry decisions. Furthermore, the firms' competitive environment is not included in the analysis, which certainly has a strong influence on entering coopetition-like setting firms find themselves in when entering formal standardization committees.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Internationally active companies represented in the SSO include big players such as Bosch, Siemens, and IBM, which are multinational companies. Since Vasudeva et al [98] find that firms' interorganizational learning within standardization is embedded in their macro-level country context, a replication of the study for other national SSOs, like DIN in Germany, would allow a further confirmation of the identified firm-level characteristics as drivers of firms' entry decisions. Furthermore, the firms' competitive environment is not included in the analysis, which certainly has a strong influence on entering coopetition-like setting firms find themselves in when entering formal standardization committees.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Wiegmann [104] show that companies often simultaneously engage in markets, SSOs and lobbying. Moreover, Leiponen [65] and Bar and Leiponen [8] and recently Vasudeva et al [98] have begun to investigate companies' contributions to activities within SSOs. At the same time, SSOs are growing in importance due to the globalization of innovation [27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ample research demonstrates that nation-state institutional logics strongly affect organizational outcomes and their legitimation. Examples include the organization of railroads (Dobbin, 1994) and inter-organizational learning effectiveness across technological areas (Vasudeva, Alexander, & Jones, 2015). These studies demonstrate the non-trivial role of national institutional logics, illustrating that organizations tend to adopt nationally-scripted practices and operate within an acceptable zone of conformity 1 (Bundy & Pfarrer, 2015:353).…”
Section: From Institutional Logics To National Governance Logicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Foundational institutional theory research asserts that firm structures take the characteristics of their environments rather than of their activities (Meyer and Rowan, 1977). Newer institutional logics research reflects the increasing complexity of modern organizations and their interactions with their environment (Marquis and Lounsbury, 2007;Vasudeva, Alexander, Jones, 2015), and challenges associated with plural, blended, and sometimes competing logics (Geng, Yoshikawa, Colpan, 2016;Lounsbury, 2007;Ramus, Vaccaro, Brusoni, 2016). Thornton, Ocasio, and Lounsbury (2012) highlight that the institutional logics perspective is "a new approach to culture, structure, and process" (p.iii).…”
Section: Iva Translucent Institutional Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%