Institutional support, hazards, and internationalization of emerging market firms

Abstract

Research SummaryWe utilize the institution‐based view to study the effect of home institutions on the internationalization of emerging economy firms. We argue that institutional support and institutional hazards co‐exist and can influence firm internationalization simultaneously. However, institutional support has a stronger effect on internationalization than institutional hazards. Further, we argue that when the institutional environment is supportive of the internationalization effort, state ownership provides proximity to institutional resources and thus amplifies the relationship between institutional support and firm internationalization. However, when the institutional environment is perilous to business activities, state ownership increases dependency on the institutional environment and constrains the escape from the domestic market. Results based on the World Bank Enterprises Survey of 9,337 manufacturing firms from 81 emerging economies largely support our arguments.Managerial SummaryHome country institutions have different components, some of which can support while others can hinder the internationalization of emerging economy firms. Our study helps managers to identify different types of home‐based institutional supports that can help international expansion and home‐based institutional hazards that firms can avoid by diversifying their sales geographically. The findings suggest that leveraging institutional support at home country has a stronger effect on internationalization than escaping institutional hazards because institutional supports can complement other home‐based advantages that emerging economy firms have. Furthermore, state ownership can increase a firm's proximity to institutional resources, providing firms greater access to institutional support for international expansion.

Research Published in Management International Review from 2006 to 2020: A Bibliometric Analysis and Future Directions

“…Authors also focused on topics related to political connections (Banerjee & Venaik, 2018 ; Liedong & Frynas, 2018 ), corruption (Jiménez et al, 2017 ), and political risk (Han et al, 2018 ). As IB research continues to examine contextual heterogeneity among emerging economies (Pattnaik et al, 2020 ; Scalera et al, 2020 ) and EMF internationalization issues (Kumar et al, 2020 ; Mukherjee et al, 2021 ; Nuruzzaman et al, 2020 ), future scholars may focus their attention on the following two broad directions: What are the idiosyncratic aspects of EMFs and emerging economies and how do such factors affect MNE theorization? What are the sources of cross and within-country variations in emerging economies?…”

Behind the internationalization of family SMEs: A strategy tripod synthesis

“…Formal institutions such as the political dynamics of home country may shape family SME internationalization endeavors (Duran et al, 2017(Duran et al, , 2019. Since not all SMEs have the good fortune of being born in entrepreneur-friendly countries, it is likely that entrepreneur-unfriendly formal home-country institutions may push some SMEs to go abroad to escape (Fathallah, Branzei, & Schaan, 2018;Nuruzzaman, Singh, & Gaur, 2019). A rich literature in the domain of business groups has explored how political and other formal institutional ties help firms in their internationalization efforts (Mukherjee, Makarius, & Stevens, 2018).…”

WTO accession and firm exports in developing economies

“…Some of these surveys are done in two different time periods, which provides the opportunity to observe the change in firm characteristics (including its exporting performance) over time. The survey’s sample is from the population of publicly listed businesses in each country and follows a stratified random sampling methodology (Nuruzzaman et al, 2020 ; Nuruzzaman, Singh, & Pattnaik, 2019 ).…”