Instrumental Evaluation: X-Rays, MRI

Giannini, Silvana; Ondo, Elie Parfait Assako; Sabino, Giuseppe

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33355-7_23

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Discussion1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2018

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…16 In this series, the majority of the indications were based on clinical symptoms. It was not easy to explore patients with X-ray, ultrasound or RMI as recommended in many studies, 17,18 this because the cost of all investigations is supported by the patient. Other reason is that the necessity of MRI in the diagnostic algorithm for Subacromial impingement syndrome is controversial.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional outcome of arthroscopic subacromial decompression at the AGDAL’s clinic in Rabat

Bakriga¹,

A²,

Karrakchou³

et al. 2018

MOJOR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to report our experience of arthroscopic subacromial decompression at the beginning experience. We retrospectively reviewed 27 patients who underwent arthroscopic subacromial decompression. The functional evaluation was done using the Constant score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS).The series consisted of 22 women for every 5 men. All patients underwent subacromial decompression (SAD) by the arthroscopic technique associated or not with the rotator cuff repair. The mean Constant score increased from 47 preoperatively to 85 postoperatively. The shoulder arthroscopy procedure is a less invasive and safe procedure and provides good result in subacromial decompression. Citation: Bakriga B, Bah A, Karrakchou S, et al. Functional outcome of arthroscopic subacromial decompression at the AGDAL's clinic in Rabat. MOJ Orthop Rheumatol. 2018;10(2):90-92.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%