1981
DOI: 10.2172/59237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instrumentation Report No. 2: identification, evaluation, and remedial actions related to transducer failures at the spent fuel test-climax

Abstract: The Spent Fuel Test-Climax (SFT-C) is a test of the feasibility of safe and reliable short-term storage and retrieval of spent fuel from commercial nuclear reactors. In support of operational and technical goals of the test, about 850 channels of instrumentation have been installed at the SFT-C. Failure of several near-field instruments began less than six months after emplacement of 11 canisters of spent fuel and activation of six thermally similar simulators. The failed units were linear potentiometers (used… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nine gauges of the new design were reinstalled in place of failed units from June [16][17]1981. All of these new units appear to be functioning normally to date (Patrick, Carlson, and Rector, 1981).…”
Section: History Of Failuresmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nine gauges of the new design were reinstalled in place of failed units from June [16][17]1981. All of these new units appear to be functioning normally to date (Patrick, Carlson, and Rector, 1981).…”
Section: History Of Failuresmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The stressmeters were removed from the two vertical holes (6 units) and one end of one horizontal hole (3 units). Other units were left in place to avoid damaging units that were still functioning (Patrick, Carlson, and Rector, 1981).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Failuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Q/A Plan referred to in the last objective of the preceding section requires thorough documentation of these activities, so the source of the parameters used, the algorithms applied, background information, and references will be given in same detail. Much of the needed reference information is contained in a relatively few documents: The Technical Concept (Ramspott et al, 1979), a series of Project Interim Reports (Carlson et al, 1980;Patrick et al, 1982;Patrick et al, 1983;Patrick et al, 1984a), and three reports on instrument installation and performance (Brough and Patrick, 1982;Patrick, Carlson, and Rector, 1981;Patrick, Rector, and Scarafiotti, 1984c). It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the Livermore Time Share System (LTSS), in particular, the XPORT utility for file transport and storage, and its directory structure (Smith and Belles, 1981).…”
Section: Report Organization Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%