DOI: 10.15368/theses.2011.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intake, apparent digestibility, and digesta passage in leopard tortoises (Geochelone pardalis) fed a complete, extruded feed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DM, OM, ash, AIA, aNDF, and sADF of the pelleted CNTRL diet is similar to that determined for the same formula as an extruded diet (Lickel, 2010), although sADF was slightly lower than expected in the CNTRL diet, and lower than that determined by Lickel (2010) (Table 9). This may be due to typical variation in raw ingredient composition or human error during analysis, although duplicate results were very consistent.…”
Section: Selected Nutrient Analysissupporting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The DM, OM, ash, AIA, aNDF, and sADF of the pelleted CNTRL diet is similar to that determined for the same formula as an extruded diet (Lickel, 2010), although sADF was slightly lower than expected in the CNTRL diet, and lower than that determined by Lickel (2010) (Table 9). This may be due to typical variation in raw ingredient composition or human error during analysis, although duplicate results were very consistent.…”
Section: Selected Nutrient Analysissupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Measured GE of the CNTRL diet was slightly higher than previously measured for the same formula in an extruded form (18.18 kJ/g; Lickel, 2010). Since all diets in this study, and that of Lickel (2010), were ground and pelleted using the same procedure for GE determination via bomb calorimetry, the original form of the diet (pelleted versus extruded) should not be a factor in the difference.…”
Section: Selected Nutrient Analysismentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations