2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12220-019-00174-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integral of Scalar Curvature on Non-parabolic Manifolds

Abstract: Using the monotonicity formulas of Colding and Minicozzi, we prove that on any complete, non-parabolic Riemannian manifold (M 3 , g) with nonnegative Ricci curvature, the asymptotic weighted scaling invariant integral of scalar curvature has an explicit bound in form of asymptotic volume ratio. Mathematics Subject Classification: 35K15, 53C44

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer to [29,36,38] for some of the recent progress on the problem. Finally, we mention that Theorem 1.4 or its localized version to an end may also be used to show the nonexistence of proper positive Green's functions under a suitable assumption on scalar curvature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to [29,36,38] for some of the recent progress on the problem. Finally, we mention that Theorem 1.4 or its localized version to an end may also be used to show the nonexistence of proper positive Green's functions under a suitable assumption on scalar curvature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Riemannian manifold M is parabolic if every subharmonic function u on M with u * = sup M u < ∞, must be constant [8,20], equivalently, if every positive superharmonic function u on M is constant. Otherwise M is said to be non-parabolic.…”
Section: Schouten Solitonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where B r (p) is the open ball with radius r and center at p. For more details see, [20] and also references therein.…”
Section: Schouten Solitonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, Yau proposed a more general version of this problem that is involved with the σ k , k = 1, 2, • • • , n of Ricci tensor in [40]. Unfortunately, Yang [38] constructs a counterexample on Kähler manifold to prove that the general version of Yau's Problem 1.5 does not hold for k = 1, 2, • • • , n − 1, Xu [37] obtains an estimate involved with the integral of scalar curvature towards the Problem 1.5 in the case of three-dimensional Riemannian manifold by using the monotonicity formulas of Colding and Minicozzi [5]. However, Problem 1.5 remains open.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%