Proc. Indon Petrol. Assoc., 37th Ann. Conv.
DOI: 10.29118/ipa.0.13.g.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Cleat Analysis And Coal Quality On CBM Exploration In Sangatta II Field, Kutai Basin, East Kalimantan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic parameters used in the permeability model are as follows: ,,,, E x ,b = 3.5 GPa, E y ,b = 3 GPa, E z ,b = 2.8 GPa, ν yx ,b = 0.28, ν zy ,b = 0.33, ν xz ,b = 0.31, and R C = 150. Other parameters, which are reasonable compared with the literature values, , are listed in Figure . In general, the model’s results match well with the experimental data (see Figure ).…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The basic parameters used in the permeability model are as follows: ,,,, E x ,b = 3.5 GPa, E y ,b = 3 GPa, E z ,b = 2.8 GPa, ν yx ,b = 0.28, ν zy ,b = 0.33, ν xz ,b = 0.31, and R C = 150. Other parameters, which are reasonable compared with the literature values, , are listed in Figure . In general, the model’s results match well with the experimental data (see Figure ).…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The basic parameters of the permeability model are as follows: ,,,, E x ,b = 3.6 GPa, E y ,b = 3.2 GPa, E z ,b = 2.9 GPa, ν yx ,b = 0.31, ν zy ,b = 0.35, ν xz ,b = 0.33, R C = 300, ε s = 0.04, and p mL = 3 MPa. Other parameters used in the model are shown in Figure and are reasonable compared with those in the literature (the flow channel aperture, the tortuosity correction coefficient, and the internal swelling factor). The initial flow channel aperture and spacing are determined by matching with the initially measured permeability data .…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 2D box-counting method also comes with certain limitations like it is very time consuming (Gillespie et al 1993) and can be subjective due to the complicated nature of the fracture networks in some cases. Nevertheless, measurement of cleat attributes along 1-D scanlines is popular amongst researchers (Apriyani et al 2014;Hooker et al 2009;Marrett et al 1999;Ortega et al 2006;Sapiie et al 2014;Solano-Acosta et al 2007;Weniger et al 2016) due to several reasons: (1) it is a relatively quick and straightforward technique as trigonometric corrections are not required for single/two sets of parallel fractures; (2) multiple related attributes, such as spacing, aperture, etc. can be measured together; (3) the technique is independent of the scale of measurement and of rock-types that facilitates comparison between similar dataset from different lithologies of varied scales.…”
Section: Measurement Of Aperture and Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a considerable contrast to the cleats spacing value on LP 67 towards the LP 2A and LP 2B ones, the cleats spacing value of LP 67 tend to be more dense and intense. The determination of cleats genesis is done by dividing the genesis based on the rotation angle of the cleat to the bedding plane wherein if the resulting angle between 70 -90 o is classified as endogenic cleat and if the resulting corner <70 o is classified as an exogenic cleat (Apriyani, N ,, et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%