2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10712-018-9495-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Ground Penetrating Radar Measurements Applied to Tomb Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the 2D/3D electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) has become more important for imagining and mapping complex geological and archaeological structures at various depths (Barker, 1981;Bernardes et al, 2017;Clark, 1990;Cozzolino et al, 2012;Dabas et al, 2000;Dahlin, 2001;Gemail, 2015;Gemail et al, 2004Gemail et al, , 2016Griffiths et al, 1990;Griffiths & Barker, 1993;Overmeeren & Ritsema, 1988;Papadopoulos et al, 2007Papadopoulos et al, , 2009. Recently, much attention has been given to the development of GPR and ERT instrumentation to improve their sensitivity and acquisition speed, while archaeological prospecting has appreciated major advances in this respect (Arka et al, 2019;Deiana et al, 2018;Ortega-Ramírez et al, 2020). The use of both techniques in archaeological prospecting, either individually or in combined use, is extensively discussed in several recent publications (e.g., Arka et al, 2019;de Silva et al, 2014;Drahor et al, 2011;Fernández-Alvarez et al, 2017;Küçükdemirci et al, 2017;López et al, 2015;Ortega-Ramírez et al, 2020;Utsi, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the 2D/3D electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) has become more important for imagining and mapping complex geological and archaeological structures at various depths (Barker, 1981;Bernardes et al, 2017;Clark, 1990;Cozzolino et al, 2012;Dabas et al, 2000;Dahlin, 2001;Gemail, 2015;Gemail et al, 2004Gemail et al, , 2016Griffiths et al, 1990;Griffiths & Barker, 1993;Overmeeren & Ritsema, 1988;Papadopoulos et al, 2007Papadopoulos et al, , 2009. Recently, much attention has been given to the development of GPR and ERT instrumentation to improve their sensitivity and acquisition speed, while archaeological prospecting has appreciated major advances in this respect (Arka et al, 2019;Deiana et al, 2018;Ortega-Ramírez et al, 2020). The use of both techniques in archaeological prospecting, either individually or in combined use, is extensively discussed in several recent publications (e.g., Arka et al, 2019;de Silva et al, 2014;Drahor et al, 2011;Fernández-Alvarez et al, 2017;Küçükdemirci et al, 2017;López et al, 2015;Ortega-Ramírez et al, 2020;Utsi, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multichannel systems and new inversion techniques, developed between the 1980s and the 1990s, rapidly increased, in fact, the application and popularity of this technique in different archaeological contexts [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. During the last 10 years, thanks to the development of 3D ERT surveys and new tools for 3D data inversion, this method enhances the possibility to reconstruct the spatial distribution and the shape of the archaeological targets, both in small or large areas, as well as in rural or urban context [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In this wide range of applications and possible uses of the ERT, undoubtedly, the main advantage offered by this method is An intensive agro-pastoral economy characterized the Terramare culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data integration is being increasingly used in the context of geomorphological and archaeological studies. This combination, in fact, allows to identify and describe both in a timely manner with FDEM methods natural structures related to the presence of water (e.g., paleo-environment), where the ERT method helps to better detail those and to recognize the presence of anthropogenic remains, whose exact identification requires a higher resolution than that offered by EM methods [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%