Integrated Environmental Management: Moving from Theory to Practice

Margerum, Richard D.; Born, Stephen M.

doi:10.1080/09640569512922

Cited by 115 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Such an approach is often adopted unproblematically (e.g. Roe, 2000) and has been proposed as the ideal by Margerum & Born (1995). Nevertheless, it is unlikely to be satisfactory.…”

Section: Exclusion Of Peoplementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Exclusion: the necessary difference between ideal and practical consensus

Connelly

Richardson

2004

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Such an approach is often adopted unproblematically (e.g. Roe, 2000) and has been proposed as the ideal by Margerum & Born (1995). Nevertheless, it is unlikely to be satisfactory.…”

Section: Exclusion Of Peoplementioning

confidence: 99%

“…A necessary corollary is therefore the assumption of a possibility of movement in positions. Such movement relies on the potential for learning, through the acquisition and sharing of information (Margerum & Born, 1995), the overcoming of misunderstanding (Sidaway, 1998) and through the creation of new ideas (Healey, 1998).…”

Section: Exclusion Of Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exclusion: the necessary difference between ideal and practical consensus

Connelly

Richardson

2004

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Haider & Rao (2010), for example, particularly analyze five separate analytical methods focused on understanding power relationships among key societal segments in international development. ISSN 2161-7104 2013 www.macrothink.org/jpag 170 Many governance systems consist of isolated activities within and between different structural components of the system (Margerum, 1995). Several institutions in a particular nation, for example, may be actively setting national visions and targets for social development without ever connecting; at best duplicating effort and at worst working at cross-purposes.…”

Section: Securing Connected Effort Within Governance Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Governance Systems Analysis (GSA): A Framework for Reforming Governance Systems

Dale¹,

Vella²,

Potts³

2013

jpag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most commentators understand that contemporary social, economic and environmental challenges require quality governance from global to local scales. While public scrutiny of governance has increased in recent years, the literature on frameworks and methods for analysis in complex, poly-centric and multi-thematic governance systems remains fragmented; displaying many disciplinary or sectoral biases. This paper establishes a stronger theory-based foundation for the analysis of complex governance systems. It also develops a clear analytical framework applicable across a vast array of differing governance themes, domains and scales (GSA). The key methodological steps and evaluative criteria for the GSA framework are determined and practical guidance for its application in reform is provided.

show abstract

“…Biswas, 2004;Imperial, 2012;Margerum and Born, 1995;Mitchell, 1990;Mostert et al, 2008). Structural integration is one of the two main means of achieving integration, the other being collaboration.…”

Section: Structural Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who should do what in environmental management? Twelve principles for allocating responsibilities

Mostert¹

2015

Environmental Science & Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In environmental management there is often discussion on the allocation of responsibilities. Such discussions can continue for a long time and can form an obstacle for effective action. In this article twelve normative principles for the allocation of responsibilities are identified, coming from three different sources: the arguments used in discussions on responsibilities, Dutch and European law, and the environmental management literature. The principles are 1) capacity, 2) lowest social costs, 3) causation, 4) interest, 5) scale, 6) subsidiarity, 7) structural integration, 8) separation, 9) solidarity, 10) transparency, 11) stability (but not standstill), and 12) acquired rights. These principles point to fundamental tensions in environmental management and sometimes conflict with each other. At the same time they may help to resolve conflicts by providing common points of reference that are independent from the often conflicting interests of the discussants.

show abstract

Integrated Environmental Management: Moving from Theory to Practice

Cited by 115 publications

References 41 publications

Exclusion: the necessary difference between ideal and practical consensus

Exclusion: the necessary difference between ideal and practical consensus

Governance Systems Analysis (GSA): A Framework for Reforming Governance Systems

Who should do what in environmental management? Twelve principles for allocating responsibilities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About