Integrated Life Cycle Assessment Modelling of Densified Fuel Production from Various Biomass Species

Abstract

This work presents new data on the life cycle impact assessment of various lignocellulosic biomass types in Mexico. A comparative life cycle assessment model of biomass densification systems was conducted. An integrated approach that incorporated various process variables, such as technology and variations in feed properties, within the analysis was employed to evaluate the environmental impact of producing 1 MJ of energy-containing densified fuel. The results show that the densification unit and curing (fuel drying) have the highest impact on the life cycle’s operational energy and the total life cycle energy, respectively. Of all the 33 biomass types from the 17 species sources considered in this study, sweet sorghum and sandbur grass have the highest global warming potential, 0.26 and 0.24 (kg CO2-eq), and human toxicity 0.58 and 0.53 (kg 1,4-dichlorobenzene-eq), respectively, while coffee pulp and cooperi pine wood have the least impact in both categories, with values of 0.08 and 0.09 (kg CO2-eq), and 0.17 and 0.16 (kg 1,4-dichlorobenzene-eq), respectively. Chichicaxtla sawmill slabs also have a low environmental impact, and cooperi pine and Ceiba wood have the lowest ozone depletion and ecotoxicity potential. A sensitivity analysis indicated the effects of the transportation system and energy source on the life cycle’s environmental impact. Adequate feed preparation, the blending of multiple feeds in the optimum ratio, and the careful selection of densification technology could improve the environmental performance of densifying some of the low-bulk-density feed biomass types.

The impact of lignocellulosic ethanol production on the environment from a life cycle perspective

“…For example, Disni Gamaralalage et al reported that using Malaysian palm kernel shells to generate electricity was more beneficial than using native wood chips [7]. Rukayya Ibrahim Muazu et al used LCA to conclude that the densification unit and curing (fuel drying) had the highest impact on the life cycle's operational energy and the total life cycle energy [8].…”

A Study of Generation and Regulation of Crop Residue: Bioenergy

“…If bioenergy is consumed instead of fossil fuels, carbon neutrality can be achieved (Yang et al, 2019) (Paraschiv and Paraschiv, 2023). There has been an increase of interest in lignocellulosic feedstock due to the growing focus on bioenergy (Fusi et al, 2021); (Muazu et al, 2022). Biomass has advantages such as renewability and diversification, making it a potential source of primary energy having approximately 10 11 Gt of supply potential (Majada et al, 2021).…”

Net-Zero Action Recommendations for Scope 3 Emission Mitigation Using Life Cycle Assessment

“…Any stage of a product or service life cycle, comprising material acquisition, manufacturing, distribution logistics, use and resource circulation [11], as shown in Figure 1, can emit GHG. The stages can occur worldwide and interact with other supply chains globally [12][13][14]. A comprehensive LCA accounts for the impacts of all interacting global supply chains allocated to the concerned products, activities or services [11,15].…”