Integrated Product, Process and Manufacturing System Development Reference Model to develop Cyber-Physical Production Systems - The Sensing, Smart and Sustainable Microfactory Case Study

Assessing relations between Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review

“…x (Miranda et al 2017) x (Rødseth, Schjølberg, and Marhaug 2017) x (Sharpe et al 2018) x (Thoben, Wiesner, and Wuest 2017) x (Yu, Xu, and Lu 2015) x T o t a l 7 7 1 1 x (Esmaeilian et al 2018) x (French, Benakis, and Marin-Reyes 2017) x x (Holligan, Hargaden, and Papakostas 2017) x (Mashhadi and Behdad 2018) x (Menon, Kärkkäinen, and Gupta 2016) x (Menon et al 2018) x (Nasiri, Tura, and Ojanen 2017) x (Pacis, Subido Jr., and Bugtai 2017) x (Pistol, Bucea-Manea-Tonis, and Bucea-Manea-Tonis 2017)…”

“…Regarding lifecycle management, the literature considers all five I4.0 technologies discussed in this paper, with a focus on AM (see Table 10). Depending on the authors, AM can be exploited to (i) improve the overall CE performance ( (Miranda et al 2017), and (iv) improve the traceability of circular practices (Sharpe et al 2018). The IoT is considered by experts as a good method for linking product lifecycle management and digital manufacturing, for example, through cloud computing x x (Dutta et al 2001) x (Fisher et al 2018) x (Giurco et al 2014) x x (Liao et al 2017) x (Lopes de Sousa Jabbour et al 2018a) x (Lopes de Sousa Jabbour et al 2018b) x (Moreno and Charnley 2016) x (Nasiri, Tura, and Ojanen 2017) x (Okorie et al 2018) x (Pagoropoulos, Pigosso, and McAloone 2017) x (Planing 2017) x (Rajala et al 2018) x (Reuter 2016) x (Salminen, Ruohomaa, and Kantola 2017) x (Seele and Lock 2017) x (Srai et al 2016) x (Stock and Seliger 2016) x (Thomas 2018) x (Tseng et al 2018) x (Unruh 2018) x (X.…”

“…Wang, Ong, and Nee 2018) x Total 5 4 3 13 (Barbosa et al 2016) x (Bassi 2017) x (Deschamps et al 2018) x (Gürdür and Gradin 2017) x (Hehenberger et al 2016) x (Holligan, Hargaden, and Papakostas 2017) x (Isaksson, Hallstedt, and Öhrwall Rönnbäck 2018) x (Jensen and Remmen 2017) x (Kusiak 2018) x (J. Li et al 2015) x (Ma et al 2018) x (Mashhadi and Behdad 2018) x (Menon, Kärkkäinen, and Gupta 2016) x (Menon et al 2018) x (Minetola and Eyers 2018) x (Miranda et al 2017) x (Müller et al 2018) x (Pacis, Subido Jr., and Bugtai 2017) x (Rødseth, Schjølberg, and Marhaug 2017) x (Sauerwein, Bakker, and Balkenende 2017) x (Schmidt et al 2017) x (Schroeder et al 2016a) x (Schroeder et al 2016b) x (Sinclair et al 2018) x (Sharpe et al 2018) x (Sheng Yang et al 2017) x (Syed-Khaja, Perez, and Franke 2016)…”

A comprehensive review of big data analytics throughout product lifecycle to support sustainable smart manufacturing: A framework, challenges and future research directions

“…The term CPS refers to the tight conjoining of and coordination between computational and physical resources with adaptability, autonomy and usability (Watanabe et al, 2016). In addition to CPS, there are several similar concepts, such as, CPPS (Miranda et al, 2017;Monostori, 2014;Wright, 2013), and CPSS (Berger et al, 2016).…”

Socio-cyberphysical systems and intellectual space in the development of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation

“…The study of socio-cyberphysical systems from the interaction between the physical and cyber world allows considering the socio-cyberphysical systems as the most effective and stabling systems in the process of their implementation [8]. In this case, a new challenges class arises, a new field of studies related to the modeling, design and testing of sociocyberphysical systems prior to their implementation is opened [9], [10]. The methods and tools associated with the physical and cyber space are not suitable for the sociocyberphysical systems.…”