2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Project Delivery as Integration between Solution Development and Solution Implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The IPD method began to be implemented in practice when in 2007 the American Institute of Architects (AIA) introduced this new system of project delivery that promotes a more efficient performance via a greater integration of the various stakeholders (Mesa et al, 2016). The IPD consists of an alternative and highly collaborative contractual agreement (American Institute of Architects & Associated General Contractors of America, 2004;Kent & Becerik-Gerber, 2010;Mihic et al, 2014) between at least three main parties involved in the project: the client, the designer, and the contractor; it requires the use of the BIM methodology and the integration of technology in the contract (Mihic et al, 2014;Raisbeck et al, 2010); it promotes high performance of the teams involved by aligning incentives and goals; and increases the construction project's final value to the client by reducing waste and promoting the relationship between the stakeholders (Kent & Becerik-Gerber, 2010;Raisbeck et al, 2010). While the IPD may have advantages over other procurement methods regarding certain types or dimensions of construction projects, the literature suggests, however, that it may produce disadvantageous results in less complex and smaller projects (Mesa et al, 2016).…”
Section: Relevance Of Relational Contracting In Reducing Asymmetric Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The IPD method began to be implemented in practice when in 2007 the American Institute of Architects (AIA) introduced this new system of project delivery that promotes a more efficient performance via a greater integration of the various stakeholders (Mesa et al, 2016). The IPD consists of an alternative and highly collaborative contractual agreement (American Institute of Architects & Associated General Contractors of America, 2004;Kent & Becerik-Gerber, 2010;Mihic et al, 2014) between at least three main parties involved in the project: the client, the designer, and the contractor; it requires the use of the BIM methodology and the integration of technology in the contract (Mihic et al, 2014;Raisbeck et al, 2010); it promotes high performance of the teams involved by aligning incentives and goals; and increases the construction project's final value to the client by reducing waste and promoting the relationship between the stakeholders (Kent & Becerik-Gerber, 2010;Raisbeck et al, 2010). While the IPD may have advantages over other procurement methods regarding certain types or dimensions of construction projects, the literature suggests, however, that it may produce disadvantageous results in less complex and smaller projects (Mesa et al, 2016).…”
Section: Relevance Of Relational Contracting In Reducing Asymmetric Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors consider nine fundamental principles to obtain the maximum benefits from the IPD (American Institute of Architects & Associated General Contractors of America, 2004;Kent & Becerik-Gerber, 2010;Mihic et al, 2014): 1) a multi-party agreement; 2) mutual respect and trust; 3) mutual benefits and rewards; 4) collaborative innovation and joint decision-making; 5) initial involvement of key stakeholders; 6) setting goals at the beginning of the project; 7) intensified planning; 8) open communication; and 9) effective organization and leadership in construction project management.…”
Section: Relevance Of Relational Contracting In Reducing Asymmetric Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In paper [11], the advantages of integrated project delivery methods (strategies) are highlighted. It is also noted there that these strategies emerged because the traditional methods demonstrated their lack of effectiveness.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pastatų projektai tampa vis sudėtingesni, todėl galima išskirti kelias pagrindinės kasdienių problemų ir iššūkių grupes įgyvendinant statybos projektus (Azhar et al 2014;Kraatz et al 2014;Mihic et al 2014):…”
Section: Tyrimo Problematika Metodologija Ir Rezultataiunclassified