Integrating Decision Support and Social Networks

Antunes, Francisco; Costa, João Paulo

doi:10.1155/2012/574276

Cited by 23 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These techniques provide a larger spectrum of possibilities in searching and recovering relevant information (Antunes & Costa, 2012). Compared to ontologies, 'folksonomies' offer greater flexibility and adaptability in or-5 ganising information, and users do not need to agree on a detailed tag hierarchy and taxonomy, though it implies that each user can create a separate set of tags that would then need to be disambiguated, using specific ontologies to be created or a combination with existing ontologies.…”

Section: Aq18mentioning

confidence: 99%

Semantic web and decision support systems

Antunes

Freire

Costa

2015

Journal of Decision Systems

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Aq18mentioning

confidence: 99%

Semantic web and decision support systems

Antunes

Freire

Costa

2015

Journal of Decision Systems

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The next model is needed to integrate decision support and SN [49], i.e. adopting social networks for decision support within an organization [50].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Method of Weight Update in Group DecisionMaking to Accommodate the Interests of All the Decision Makers

Hamdani¹,

Wardoyo²,

Mustofa³

2017

IJISA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The weight updates are required for group decision-making which has similar parameters used by the decision maker (DM). Each DM as the stakeholder may have similar or different parameters in selecting parameters. Therefore, we have to accommodate the interests of all decision makers (DMs) to obtain alternative decisions. DM who has selected the parameters inputs the initial weight ( based on the classical methods, and then recalculates to obtain the updated weights ( until the final weight ( is obtained for the alternative of group decision-making (GDM). The initial weight uses a weighting directly or multi criteria decision-making (MCDM). This method aims to provide the fairness for all DMs who have different knowledge in determining the value of the weights and the selection parameters. In order to obtain alternative decisions, we used technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method to update weight. In this paper, the alternative output of the decisions is applied in two stages: the decisions of each DM and the group, where this output consists of four types of alternatives. Based on the proposed method, the result of GDM shows that the third alternative is recommended in decision-making. This method is effectively performed in decision-making which has different parameters and weights of each DM to support group decision.

show abstract

“…They facilitate the introduction of 'web-based collaborative decision' [53]. They are commonly known as Web 2.0 and Semantic Web (Web 3.0) which introduces an improved ability to connect and organise the content of information distributed across multiple pages or sites [52].…”

Section: Collaborative Dssmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of the Current Level of Support to Aid Decisions for Migrating to Cloud Computing

Alkhalil

Sahandi

John

2016

Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of Things and Cloud Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cloud computing provides an innovative delivery model that enables enterprises to reduce operational costs and improve flexibility and scalability. Organisations wishing to migrate their legacy systems to the cloud often need to go through a difficult and complicated decision-making process. This can be due to multiple factors including restructuring IT resources, the still evolving nature of the cloud environment, and the continuous expansion of the services offered. These have increased the requirement for tools and techniques to help the decision-making process for migration. Although significant contributions have been made in this area, there are still many aspects which require further support. This paper evaluates the existing level of support to aid the decision-making process. It examines the complexity of decisions, evaluates the current state of Decision Support Systems in respect of migrating to the cloud, and analyses three models that proposed support for the migration processes. This paper identifies the need for a coherent approach for supporting the whole decision-making process. Further, it explores possible new approaches for addressing the complex issues involved in decision-making for migrating to the cloud.

show abstract

Integrating Decision Support and Social Networks

Cited by 23 publications

References 45 publications

Semantic web and decision support systems

Semantic web and decision support systems

A Method of Weight Update in Group DecisionMaking to Accommodate the Interests of All the Decision Makers

A Review of the Current Level of Support to Aid Decisions for Migrating to Cloud Computing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About