2014
DOI: 10.1080/21693277.2014.895689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with PROMETHEE method for total quality management consultant selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results are evaluated with sensitivity analysis. By changing criteria's weights the direction of decision axis may change while alternatives and criteria keep the same position (Kabir and Sumi, 2014;Ishizaka et al, 2020).…”
Section: Gaia Planementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results are evaluated with sensitivity analysis. By changing criteria's weights the direction of decision axis may change while alternatives and criteria keep the same position (Kabir and Sumi, 2014;Ishizaka et al, 2020).…”
Section: Gaia Planementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four proposed scenarios are compared with the multicriteria analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the result and discussion section. The AHP may be a powerful tool in the context of decision making, assisting in situations with several dependent (alternative decisions) and independent variables (decision criteria) (Hofmann & Knébel, 2013;Kabir & Sumi, 2014).…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth highlighting in this study that Saremi et al (2009) report that the five selection criteria were determined by the council, without showing any scientific basis or supporting standard for this. This also occurs with Kabir and Sumi (2014), the study is intended for TQM consultant selection through integrating two multicriteria methods. However, there was not a scientific technical foundation of the criteria as well.…”
Section: Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%