2020
DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating the Population Perspective into Health System Performance Assessment (IPHA): Study Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study in Germany Linking Survey and Claims Data of Statutorily and Privately Insured

Abstract: Background: Health system performance assessment (HSPA) is a major tool for evidence-based governance in health systems and patient/population-orientation is increasingly considered as an important aspect. The IPHA study aims (1) to undertake a comprehensive performance assessment of the German health system from a population perspective based on the intermediate and final dimensions defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) and (2) to identify differences in HSPA between (a) common user characteristics … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is happened because the patient's perception has been underused to assess performance. 115,116 However, some studies suggest caution in comparing performance between different health systems, emphasizing that in order to be relevant, comparisons require in-depth knowledge of these systems. 117 In this way, the studies aim to identify the set of indicators that can be used in different countries as a comparison parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is happened because the patient's perception has been underused to assess performance. 115,116 However, some studies suggest caution in comparing performance between different health systems, emphasizing that in order to be relevant, comparisons require in-depth knowledge of these systems. 117 In this way, the studies aim to identify the set of indicators that can be used in different countries as a comparison parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This quantitative cross‐sectional study is based on a survey (paper‐ or web‐based), which was conducted between October and December 2018 among 20,000 of a total of 2.4 million people 36 with substitutive PHI from the German health insurance company “Debeka” 35 . The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire was developed along the WHO Health Systems Framework to assess the performance of Germany's health system for all eight intermediate (access, coverage, quality, safety) and final goals (improved health, responsiveness, social and financial risk protection, improved efficiency) (see Figure 1). Survey items (see survey and respective scales in Supporting Information S1: Appendix 1) also included patient characteristics such as socio-demographics as covariates for analysing subgroups (see study protocol 35 for more details). Each intermediate and overall goal was operationalised through at least one item, consisting of validated survey questions (e.g., surveys from the Commonwealth Fund, Eurostat, Robert Koch-Institute, WHO) or accordingly adopted or newly developed questions.…”
Section: Survey Itemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Im vierten Quartal 2018 fand eine Querschnittserhebung bei 20 000 Vollversicherten der Debeka statt, die zur Teilnahme an einer Befragung (online über SoSciSurvey oder Papierfragebogen) zur Bewertung des deutschen Gesundheitssystems einmalig eingeladen wurden [13]. Die Befragungsdaten enthielten u. a. Angaben zur Soziodemografie, zum subjektiven Gesundheitsstatus sowie zu Haus-oder Facharztbesuchen in den letzten 12 Monaten.…”
Section: Methodikunclassified