2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-15413-4_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intellectual Capital Management and the Innovation Process: Does One Size Fit All?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For variable definitions, see In the software and computer services sector, although the coefficient on STRATEGY_SCORE has the expected sign, it is not statistically significant (0.017, p-value ¼ 0.886). The difficulty of software firms to protect their innovations from imitating competitors might be a possible explanation for the non-significance of the coefficient on STRATEGY_SCORE in this sector (Salazar-Elena et al, 2015). The coefficients on BVPS and EPS are statistically significant at the 1 or 5 percent level in all model specifications, except for the hardware sector where the coefficient on EPS is positive, but not significant (1.988, p-value ¼ 0.129).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For variable definitions, see In the software and computer services sector, although the coefficient on STRATEGY_SCORE has the expected sign, it is not statistically significant (0.017, p-value ¼ 0.886). The difficulty of software firms to protect their innovations from imitating competitors might be a possible explanation for the non-significance of the coefficient on STRATEGY_SCORE in this sector (Salazar-Elena et al, 2015). The coefficients on BVPS and EPS are statistically significant at the 1 or 5 percent level in all model specifications, except for the hardware sector where the coefficient on EPS is positive, but not significant (1.988, p-value ¼ 0.129).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%