2010
DOI: 10.1186/1758-3284-2-28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the management of locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomata (SCC): disease control and functional outcome using the therapy outcome measure (TOM) score - report from a single U.K. institution

Abstract: IntroductionThis paper evaluates tumour control and toxicity especially in relation to swallowing dysfunction in those patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma who have undergone either primary chemo-radiation or post-operative parotid sparing IMRT. The TOM scoring system was used to assess dysphagia.MethodsAll patients with locally advanced (stage 3/4) squamous cell oropharyngeal cancer and who required either primary or post-operative RT were identified. Toxicity was recorded pros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority included a combination of surgery, RT, and chemotherapy . Few included patients treated with definitive RT +/− chemotherapy without surgery and only one reported RT alone (hyperfractionated) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority included a combination of surgery, RT, and chemotherapy . Few included patients treated with definitive RT +/− chemotherapy without surgery and only one reported RT alone (hyperfractionated) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of those 23 studies, 15 studies could be included in the meta-analyses as described above. 25,32,37,38,[40][41][42][43]47,[49][50][51][53][54][55]…”
Section: Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported incidences of trismus in oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with IMRT can range from 4% to 77.3% (Hsieh et al, 2014; Rao et al, 2015; Ingle et al, 2010; Chao et al, 2004; Gomez et al, 2009). This wide range is likely due to different inclusion criteria; subjective or objective assessments of trismus, cut-off values for trismus, and follow-up periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ingle et al 62 -RBHOMS Myers et al 31 Cartmill et al 25 -MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory O'Hara et al 15 Prestwich et al 34 Kendall et al 33 More et al 13 Cartmill et al 25 Hutcheson et al 32 Schwartz et al 29 Levendag et al 30 Gillespie et al 26 O'Hara et al 15 De Almeida et al 37 Lee et al 22 More et al 13 Sinclair et al 38 Iseli et al 39 Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale -Park et al 35 Yamashita et al 36 Haughey et al 19 Moore et al 40 Grant et al 20…”
Section: Tom Score (Disability Domain)mentioning
confidence: 99%