2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Results in Significant Decrease in Clinical Toxicities Compared With Conventional Wedge-Based Breast Radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
138
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
138
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Excellent-to-good cosmesis after prone WBI is achieved in about 80% to 90% of patients (14,15). Chronic toxicity and cosmesis seem to compare favorably with the supine results (24)(25)(26). Comparison is, however, difficult because of the different scoring of endpoints and different patient cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excellent-to-good cosmesis after prone WBI is achieved in about 80% to 90% of patients (14,15). Chronic toxicity and cosmesis seem to compare favorably with the supine results (24)(25)(26). Comparison is, however, difficult because of the different scoring of endpoints and different patient cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, chemotherapy has been reported to result in a worsening of long-term fibrosis and cosmetic outcome [36,37]. The impact of modern anthracycline-based regimens in patients treated with HF-WBI is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Similarly, a study carried out after 4.7 years of median follow-up showed a reduction in chronic breast oedema (3% vs 30%; p 5 0.007) and hyperpigmentation (3 vs 41%; p 5 0.001), especially in patients with larger breasts (volume .1600 cm 3 ). 26 Even though breast cancer RT is one of the most diffused applications of radiation oncology, this technique is not, however, always available in all RT centres, as the use of IMRT is not always justified due to the cost of technology, particularly when less expensive alternatives that yield similar target dose coverage and normal organ sparing are readily available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%