Intensive Care Unit Capacity Strain and Outcomes of Critical Illness in a Resource-Limited Setting: A 2-Hospital Study in South Africa

Abstract

Objective: To measure the association of intensive care unit (ICU) capacity strain with processes of care and outcomes of critical illness in a resource-limited setting. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 5332 patients referred to the ICUs at 2 public hospitals in South Africa using the country’s first published multicenter electronic critical care database. We assessed the association between multiple ICU capacity strain metrics (ICU occupancy, turnover, census acuity, and referral burden) at different exposure time points (ICU referral, admission, and/or discharge) with clinical and process of care outcomes. The association of ICU capacity strain at the time of ICU admission with ICU length of stay (LOS), the primary outcome, was analyzed with a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Secondary outcomes of ICU triage decision (with strain at ICU referral), ICU mortality (with strain at ICU admission), and ICU LOS (with strain at ICU discharge), were analyzed with linear and logistic multivariable regression. Results: No measure of ICU capacity strain at the time of ICU admission was associated with ICU LOS, the primary outcome. The ICU occupancy at the time of ICU admission was associated with increased odds of ICU mortality (odds ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.11; P = .004), a secondary outcome, such that a 10% increase in ICU occupancy would be associated with a 7% increase in the odds of ICU mortality. Conclusions: In a resource-limited setting in South Africa, ICU capacity strain at the time of ICU admission was not associated with ICU LOS. In secondary analyses, higher ICU occupancy at the time of ICU admission, but not other measures of capacity strain, was associated with increased odds of ICU mortality.

Job satisfaction of registered nurses in a private critical care unit in the Eastern Cape: A pilot study

“…Currently, South Africa has 8.9 ICU beds per 100 000 population unlike the United States of America that has 30 ICU beds per 100 000 population (Anesi et al 2018 :2). The most recent available statistics indicate that in 2012 South Africa had 4168 critical care and high care beds managed by 4584 professional nurses (Pretorius & Klopper 2012 :67).…”

Results from the first audit of an intensive care unit in Botswana

“…Regional and other African ICU studies show similar demographic findings to these, unlike in high-income ICU settings. [19][20][21][22] PMH operating theatre and emergency department accounted for over 60% of ICU admissions; with trauma and non-trauma related surgical conditions accounting for over 46% of all diagnostic categories. As PMH is the major surgical referral hospital for the entire country, and the…”

Association of intensive care unit occupancy during admission and inpatient mortality: a retrospective cohort study

“…Nevertheless, a recent analysis of a smaller centre in a resource-limited setting produced similar results to our study. 20 Another limitation that should be noted is, despite our granular patient-level data, we did not possess data on the exact bed availability at the time of patient admission, which is a potentially useful metric of patient flow. Despite our more precise calculation of occupancy using patient hours, it is still an aggregated value over the course of a calendar day and not the instantaneous occupancy at the exact time a patient is admitted to the ICU.…”