2015
DOI: 10.14691/cppj.21.1.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intentional constructions of the future and preemptive goal realization: validation of the “General Proactivity Scale”

Abstract: This study reports the development and initial validation of the General Proactivity Scale (GPS). The initial 23 -item version of the GPS was tested on a sample of students (N=309) that are about to graduate university. Subjects were asked to evaluate on a 7-point Likert type scale their beliefs concerning the ways of preparation to future goals and challenges through engagement in current actions. On the basis of the EFA the fi nal version of a 19-item General Proactivity Scale was established. In the second … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proactivity was measured using a subscale of a General Proactivity Scale developed and validated by Banka [ 22 ]. This subscale consists of 9 items (e.g., “I keep looking for new ways to increase my chances of development”, “Wherever I am, I try to be a constructive force for favorable changes” [ α = 0.87]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proactivity was measured using a subscale of a General Proactivity Scale developed and validated by Banka [ 22 ]. This subscale consists of 9 items (e.g., “I keep looking for new ways to increase my chances of development”, “Wherever I am, I try to be a constructive force for favorable changes” [ α = 0.87]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proactivity was measured using a subscale of a General Proactivity Scale developed and validated by Banka [22]. This subscale consists of 9 items (e.g., "I am still looking for new ways to increase my chances of development", "Wherever I am, I try to be a constructive force for favorable changes" [α = .87]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the alternative approach, it is defined as personal initiative, i.e., behavior independently engaged of one's own volition (self-starting), proactive and lasting (Fay, Frese, 2001). However, as stressed by A. Bańka, the difference between a proactive personality and personal initiative is rather subtle, and both approaches agree on the key point that proactiveness is a certain predisposition dependent on personality-related factors (Bańka, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%