1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02036011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-laboratory comparisons: Determination of actinides in excreta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scientists have developed reliable faecal bioassay methods for 239 Pu based on alpha spectrometry, thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS), and accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). [5][6][7] However, as those methods are time consuming for sample preparation (burning, fusion, dissolution, and separation) and counting, it usually takes days to get the final assay results. Therefore, these methods are not suitable for fast population monitoring following an RN emergency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientists have developed reliable faecal bioassay methods for 239 Pu based on alpha spectrometry, thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS), and accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). [5][6][7] However, as those methods are time consuming for sample preparation (burning, fusion, dissolution, and separation) and counting, it usually takes days to get the final assay results. Therefore, these methods are not suitable for fast population monitoring following an RN emergency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%