Inter-Organizational Collaborative Networks: A Systematic Review

Schardosin, Fernando Zatt; Rolt, Carlos Roberto De; Batista, Amanda Marina Lima; Penz, Daniel; Amorin, Bianca; Bier, Clerilei Aparecida

doi:10.1109/icte-v50708.2020.9114373

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…According to Table 1, previous research works related to the formation of collaborative networks have mostly employed qualitative methods based on interviews, literature review, and case studies (e.g. Brown et al, 2019;Lyu et al, 2019;Schardosin et al, 2020). Besides, some other scholars have employed soft operations research methods (e.g.…”

Section: Insert Table 1 Herementioning

confidence: 99%

“…(Sacomano Neto and Serra Truzzi, 2009), (Lundberg, 2010), (Moeller, 2010), (Cambra-Fierro et al, 2011), (Petter et al, 2014), (Peng et al, 2018), (Schardosin et al, 2020) 21 HRM  Training human resource;  Commitment to talent management (Caglio and Ditillo, 2008), (Wu et al, 2009), (Moeller, 2010), (Oprime et al, 2011), (Petter et al, 2014), (Ricciardi et al, 2018), (Sydow et al, 2020) 21 Intangible assets  Branding;  Intellectual capital management. (Caglio and Ditillo, 2008), (Wu et al, 2009), (Moeller, 2010), (Oprime et al, 2011), (Petter et al, 2014), (Ricciardi et al, 2018), (Papa et al, 2020) 21 Autonomy and decision making  Formalisation of relations and governance;  Skills for managing international relations;  Promoting decision-making at all levels.…”

Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(UNIDO, 2003), (Caglio and Ditillo, 2008), (Sacomano Neto and Serra Truzzi, 2009), (Oprime et al, 2011), (Petter et al, 2014), (Polyantchikov et al, 2017), (Martin et al, 2018), (Schardosin et al, 2020) 16…”

Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(UNIDO, 2003), (Lin and Sun, 2010), (Niu, 2010), (Catalina, 2010), (Lundberg, 2010), (Petter et al, 2014), (Peng et al, 2018), (Schardosin et al, 2020) 15…”

Section: Limitations and Future Researchunclassified

“…Regional strategic networks Empirical research (Chang et al, 2010) Social capital, cooperative performance, collaboration (Cambra-Fierro et al, 2011) Inter-firm market orientation (IMO) (Adobor, 2011) Inter-firm strategic alliance Theory of group behavior (Li et al, 2012) Horizontal cooperation Cluster supply chain (Vuletic et al, 2017) The needs for operational collaboration Survey-Modeling (You et al, 2018) Vertical and horizontal collaborative networks Value net analysis (Martin et al, 2018) Horizontal cooperation between logistics service providers in road transportation Decision Framework-easyto-use typology (Salamat et al, 2018) Developing an international strategic alliance and capabilities Robust Fuzzy Possibilistic AHP (Andres et al, 2018) Strategies alignment and the collaborative emotion models Modeling framework to assess strategies alignment The role of trust to the sustainability of collaborative processes (Kimbu et al, 2019) Human capital management (HCM) Narrative analysis (Uster et al, 2019) Managerial behaviors of local managers Empirical examination (Schardosin et al, 2020) Collaborative networks studies Re-mixing of business assets (Semnani et al, 2015) Export clusters and exports performance Semi-structured interviews (Herczeg et al, 2018) Industrial symbiosis Extensive analysis of published studies-interview (Felzensztein et al, 2018) Inter-firm cooperation in an export-oriented regional cluster Longitudinal study (Pessot et al, 2019) Business models affecting supply chain configurations Multiple case studies analysis (Huang et al, 2020) Performance of individual policy actors embedded in the network Examination with a dataset (Papa et al, 2020) Open innovation and big data analytics on reflective knowledge exchange least-squares regression analysis (Dobrescu et al, 2021) Improving supply chain management by applying hierarchical networked control systems hierarchical networked control systems…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Evaluating key capabilities for developing global collaborative networks using a multi-layer decision-making approach

Mahdiraji

Hafeez

Kamardi

et al. 2021

IMDS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis paper proposes a multi-layer hybrid decision-making approach to evaluate the capability alternatives for developing a collaborative network to operate in the international market.Design/methodology/approachThe present study is contextualised in the Iranian pistachio export industry. An extensive review of the state-of-the-art literature on supplier collaboration was conducted to identify key capabilities that are essential to establish a collaborative network. The set of defined capabilities were then optimised through interviews with 14 experts from the relevant industry, academics and export authorities. A combination of the fuzzy Delphi method and the best–worst method (BWM) approach was, respectively, used to reduce the number of capability alternatives and assign priority weights to these alternatives. Subsequently, a weighted aggregated sum product assessment method (WASPAS) was employed to rank and evaluate the ability to creating a collaborative network for the export of pistachio.FindingsFrom the extant literature review, 18 capabilities for the formation of coordination networks in the international markets were identified. Then, the prominent indicators in forming a global network were extracted. After ranking the top pistachio export countries/regions to formalise an efficient collaborative network, it was revealed that although Iran exports approximately 30% of the global market, it falls behind the USA and European Union. The competitors have scored higher in critical criteria, including “trust and commitment”, “strategy and management”, “managerial control and standardization” and “financial resources”.Originality/valueThe proposed hybrid approach encompassing fuzzy Delphi–BWM–WASPAS offers to solve the capability evaluation and selection as well as ranking the possible alternative to formalise a collaborative network in an integrated fashion. This combination of methods is capable to first identify the most important factors, then measuring their importance and eventually rank the possible alternatives. The suggested framework provides an approach to deal with the uncertainty of global collaborative network formation.

show abstract

Section: Insert Table 1 Herementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(UNIDO, 2003), (Lin and Sun, 2010), (Niu, 2010), (Catalina, 2010), (Lundberg, 2010), (Petter et al, 2014), (Peng et al, 2018), (Schardosin et al, 2020) 15…”

Section: Limitations and Future Researchunclassified

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Evaluating key capabilities for developing global collaborative networks using a multi-layer decision-making approach

Mahdiraji

Hafeez

Kamardi

et al. 2021

IMDS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Green Virtual Enterprise Breeding Environment: A Proposal of Web Platform Model for a Circular Economy

Schardosin

Rolt

Batista

et al. 2020

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to present a proposal for a Green Virtual Breeding Environment (GVBE) grounded in Circular Economy to create Green Virtual Enterprises (GVE) for the deployment of green solutions for products and services. Through the life cycle of the products, in which, a product, for one organization is discarded and for another, input for new products. New solutions will be developed jointly by the GVBE component actors. Entitled as Reciclica GVBE it contributes to the management of residues focused on sustainability in an economically viable way. It will also contribute, with the population, organizations, and researchers to have a clearer view of the processes that involve waste management, which will allow for better citizen participation, greater responsibility on the part of companies, and new research on the subject.

show abstract

Influencing Collaboration in Sustainable Business Ecosystems

Graça,

Camarinha-Matos

2023

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inter-Organizational Collaborative Networks: A Systematic Review

Cited by 5 publications

References 60 publications

Evaluating key capabilities for developing global collaborative networks using a multi-layer decision-making approach

Evaluating key capabilities for developing global collaborative networks using a multi-layer decision-making approach

Green Virtual Enterprise Breeding Environment: A Proposal of Web Platform Model for a Circular Economy

Influencing Collaboration in Sustainable Business Ecosystems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About