1993
DOI: 10.1016/0266-1144(93)90008-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between cohesive-frictional soil and various grid reinforcements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…41) is comparable with experimental results obtained by other researches [95][96][97][98], in which its value for granular material in contact with different geogrids changes from 0.90 to 1.12.…”
Section: Soil-geosynthetic Interaction In Direct Shear Tests: Experimsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…41) is comparable with experimental results obtained by other researches [95][96][97][98], in which its value for granular material in contact with different geogrids changes from 0.90 to 1.12.…”
Section: Soil-geosynthetic Interaction In Direct Shear Tests: Experimsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Over recent decades, numerous experimental studies have been conducted to assess the shear strength parameters of soil-geosynthetic interfaces through direct shear tests (Bergado et al 1993(Bergado et al , 2006Bakeer et al 1998;O'Kelly and Naughton 2008;Liu et al 2009;Anubhav 2010;Ferreira et al 2012Ferreira et al , 2013Vieira et al 2013). However, few studies have compared the direct shear behaviour of different soil-geosynthetic interfaces for various conditions of soil moisture content and density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These parameters might be affected by several factors: for example, the physical and mechanical features of the soil, the geometry of the reinforcement, boundary conditions, the experiment equipment, and overburden pressure. Many researchers have studied the effects of various parameters on friction resistance between soil and reinforcement, through numerical and experimental approaches (Jewell et al, 1984;Milligan and Palmeira, 1987;Bergado et al, 1993;Alfaro et al, 1995;Perkins and Edens, 2003;Alfaro and Pathak, 2005;Sieira et al, 2009;Hsieh et al, 2011;Esfandiari and Selamat, 2012;Hussein and Meguid, 2013;Chen and McDowell, 2013;Shi and Wang, 2013;Balunaini et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2014;Esmaili et al, 2014;Hatami and Esmaili, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%