Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions

Lim, Youn-kyung; Stolterman, Erik; Jung, Heekyoung; Donaldson, Justin

doi:10.1145/1314161.1314183

Cited by 105 publications

(66 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Lim, Stolterman, Jung, and Donaldson (2007), in their work on what they termed interaction gestalt, the holistic experience and aesthetics of using interactive tools, explored how a number of different attributes of digital interaction technologies (e.g., pace, proximity, movement) give rise to an interaction gestalt, that is, the "felt shape" of an interaction with a technology.…”

Section: Walking Considerations From the Design Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Ways of Walking: Understanding Walking's Implications for the Design of Handheld Technology Via a Humanistic Ethnographic Approach

Eslambolchilar¹,

Bødker²,

Chamberlain³

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Walking Considerations From the Design Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Ways of Walking: Understanding Walking's Implications for the Design of Handheld Technology Via a Humanistic Ethnographic Approach

Eslambolchilar¹,

Bødker²,

Chamberlain³

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…[53] four types of experiences (sensual, emotional, and spatio-temporal). In contrast, other frameworks focus on the building blocks of interactive experiences, such as attributes of designing for location in pervasive games 2 or the design languages for interaction gestalts of Lim et al [33,34]. Drawing on the above, Lundgren [40] created a framework of interaction-related properties describing categories of interaction, expression, behaviour, complexity, change and time, and users.…”

Section: Design Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing Mobile Experiences for Collocated Interaction

Lundgren

Fischer

Reeves

et al. 2015

Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work &Amp; Social Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many of our everyday social interactions involve mobile devices. Yet, these tend to only provide good support for distributed social interactions. Although much HCI and CSCW research has explored how we might support collocated, face-to-face situations using mobile devices, much of this work exists as isolated exemplars of technical systems or interaction designs. This paper draws on a range of such exemplars to develop a practical design framework intended for guiding the design of new mobile experiences for collocated interaction as well as analysing existing ones. Our framework provides four relational perspectives for designing the complex interplay between: the social situation in which it takes place; the technology used and the mechanics inscribed; the physical environment; and the temporal elements of design. Moreover, each perspective features some core properties, which are highly relevant when designing these systems. As part of presenting the framework we also explain the process of its construction along with practical advice on how to read and apply it.

show abstract

“…etc. [22]. Each sub-categorization, however, implies, an increase of the "dimensionality" of the space of representation and complicates further the use of the model.…”

Section: A People-centered Vision and The Need Tomentioning

confidence: 99%

“Territorial smartness” and emergent behaviors

Giovannella¹

2013

2nd International Conference on Systems and Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increasing smarteness of personal devices and territories are rapidly changing the scenarios of data production. Data access and/or data possession can determine positions of privilege, but the real competitive advantage will derive more and more from the ability to identify relevant dimensions and flows and, of course, from that to extract meaningful multidimensional descriptions aimed at detecting and foreseeing emergent behaviors (particularly relevant those concerning small communities) or, in other words, from the ability to transform "big data" into "smart data".Prerequisite for obtaining this goal is the identification of appropriate models and adequate spaces of representation that may inspire the development of appropriate strategies and methods of analysis. Few examples will be provided. I. INTRODUCTIONWaiting for the advent of an usable and safe implementation of Internet-of-Things, able to transform "future visions" [1,2] into reality, at present information on the behavior of large amount of people can be collected in four different manners: a) by means of voluntary insertion of data (e.g. by filling forms or by performing on-line activities like when you use an ATM, obliterate a bus ticket, etc..); b) by means of sensors placed at key points of the flux "pipes" (e.g. energy or water consumption meters, detectors of environmental parameters, etc.); c) by associating appropriate transmitters of position to moving entities (e.g. cars, to detect the flow of traffic; waste, to follow the flow of waste recycling chains; goods, to monitor their movements, etc..); d) by means of personal devices that nowadays, due to their high level of penetration, smarteness and "always on" state, not only enable to locate the user through cell phone triangulation but also to get multidimensional information ranging from precise geolocation, to accelerations and orientations and, thanks to the cooperation of the individuals, to real time acquisition of any kind of multimedia signals.All data collected according to the above strategies are the result of individual actions but the big difference between the dataset produced by a), b), c) and most of those produce by d) resides in the different degree of access to the datasets. Those produced by a), b), c) are usually collected and owned by companies (service providers) that do not disclose the datasets because their possession is considered, in most cases, strategic; as consequence the knowledge is a prerogative of a few. Strategy d), on the other hand, produce datasets that, by means of suitable apps, are potentially accessible to anyone and could allow for a collective production of open datasets.

show abstract

Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions

Cited by 105 publications

References 21 publications

Ways of Walking: Understanding Walking's Implications for the Design of Handheld Technology Via a Humanistic Ethnographic Approach

Ways of Walking: Understanding Walking's Implications for the Design of Handheld Technology Via a Humanistic Ethnographic Approach

Designing Mobile Experiences for Collocated Interaction

“Territorial smartness” and emergent behaviors

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions

Cited by 105 publications

References 21 publications

Ways of Walking: Understanding Walking's Implications for the Design of Handheld Technology Via a Humanistic Ethnographic Approach

Ways of Walking: Understanding Walking's Implications for the Design of Handheld Technology Via a Humanistic Ethnographic Approach

Designing Mobile Experiences for Collocated Interaction

&#x201C;Territorial smartness&#x201D; and emergent behaviors

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

“Territorial smartness” and emergent behaviors