2000
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.6720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of Chlorpromazine and Trifluoperazine with Anionic Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) Micelles: Electronic Absorption and Fluorescence Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, those interactions of DTAB with BPB which result to red shift, can be attributed to the hydrophobic interactions between them. The red shift has been previously reported for other compounds upon going from polar to apolar solvents 29 and upon going from the aqueous solution to the more hydrophobic micellar environment. 30 Thermodynamic parameters of this interaction are given in Table 7.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, those interactions of DTAB with BPB which result to red shift, can be attributed to the hydrophobic interactions between them. The red shift has been previously reported for other compounds upon going from polar to apolar solvents 29 and upon going from the aqueous solution to the more hydrophobic micellar environment. 30 Thermodynamic parameters of this interaction are given in Table 7.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For interaction of SDS with TX-100 (here abbreviated as TX)we can write: (29) (30) (31) substituting equation (31) for (30) we have: . Those sc points which are obtained from the intersection of Samiey equations for adjacent regions, are shown in a box.…”
Section: Proof Of Adjacent Regions By Destructive Interaction With Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 The apparent pK a changes of the drugs induced by the micelles were observed to be consistent with a strong interaction. The binding constants (K b ) showed a significant hydrophobic contribution modulated by electrostatic interactions of the positively charged drug with the micelle headgroup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The special characteristics of the drugs binding to anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) monomers and/ or micellar aggregates were also focused. 13 K b values are higher than 5 × 10 3 M -1 for both SDS concentration ranges, at low surfactant concentrations and up to 1-2 mM (drug interaction with surfactant monomers and formation of nonmicellar aggregates) and for more concentrated solutions (in the presence of premicellar and/or micellar aggregates).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The red shift has been previously reported for other compounds upon going from polar to apolar solvents, as a result of hydrophobic interaction. [22][23][24] It seems that TX-100 molecules decrease dielectric constant of the MG + micro-environment. According to Hughs-Ingold rules for nucleophilic substitution reactions, 25,26 formation of the neutral carbinol base from two oppositely charged reactants is more favorable in lower dielectric constant media and thus with increase in TX-100 concentration, the rate of MG + fading increases in the first region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%