2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-006-1497-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of (hydroxypropyl) cellulose with anionic surfactants in dilute regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained CMC values of Tween Ò 80 and SDS were 0.018 and 7.21 mM, respectively. These concentrations were in good agreement with the previously published data obtained using the same method [36,43]. From Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The obtained CMC values of Tween Ò 80 and SDS were 0.018 and 7.21 mM, respectively. These concentrations were in good agreement with the previously published data obtained using the same method [36,43]. From Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The above relationship has been utilized to determine c* of hydroxypropyl cellulose (Martins et al 2006 …”
Section: Second Virial Coefficient (A 2 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nor the value of A 2 alone can be used for this purpose, as the associative polymers do not always have negative A 2 but still form aggregates. In order to reconcile [g] (a measurement of hydrodynamic volume of the coil) with the second virial coefficient A 2 (a measurement of thermodynamic quality of solventpolymer interaction), an empirical relationship [g] = A 2 M W has been used by many previous authors (Martins et al 2006;Lee 1992;Yamakawa 2001;Teraoka 2002 In the present study, hmHEC polymers with both high and low degrees of hydrophobic modifications have been characterized. For the convenience of analysis, they have been divided in two sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the formation of micellar aggregates of NaC has been extensively investigated, [3,6,7,13,14,20] few studies have determined the relative viscosity in the absence or presence of polymers. [21,22] As shown in Figure 5B, the g rel versus [NaC] profile reveals three distinct regions: the first extending up to 10.0 mmol L À1 includes the NaC dimer formation region ( Figure 5C); the second between 10.0 and 30.0 mmol L À1 , which characterizes the formation of primary NaC micelles, small aggregates with an average aggregation number of 4-6; [2] and the third region at concentrations above 30.0 mmol L À1 with the formation of secondary NaC micelles. According to Waissbluth et al, [23] in SELF-ASSOCIATION OF NaC AND SDoD WITH PEO this concentration range primary and secondary aggregates coexist.…”
Section: Relative Viscositymentioning
confidence: 98%