2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of language, auditory and memory brain networks in auditory verbal hallucinations

Abstract: HighlightsThe language, auditory and memory/limbic networks are of particular relevance for auditory verbal hallucinations.An increased interaction among the auditory-language and striatal brain regions occurs while patients hallucinate.Fronto-temporal connections are often altered in AVH individuals, but there is no consensus regarding increase or decrease.Connections of the interhemispheric auditory pathway are stronger for first episode patients, but they are weaker in chronic patients.The majority of studi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
157
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 196 publications
(296 reference statements)
11
157
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, previous data highlight that these distributed neuronal interactions are dynamically configured on the base of anatomical pathways 79 . Alterations of both, the connectome and gamma rhythmic activity, are suggested by the interhemispheric miscommunication theory 10 to constitute a pathophysiological mechanism underlying altered perception as it is observed, for instance, in schizophrenia patients 11 with auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) 1215 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, previous data highlight that these distributed neuronal interactions are dynamically configured on the base of anatomical pathways 79 . Alterations of both, the connectome and gamma rhythmic activity, are suggested by the interhemispheric miscommunication theory 10 to constitute a pathophysiological mechanism underlying altered perception as it is observed, for instance, in schizophrenia patients 11 with auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) 1215 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our choice to restrict analyses to the part of the matrix containing cortex stays justified in the context of target definition for neuromodulation tools. Again, the consideration that hallucinations may result from neural dysconnectivity (e.g., Ćurčić‐Blake et al, ) favors ICA over more conventional activation‐based approaches, such as GLM. Here, the ICA decomposition of time‐series provides a direct equivalent of functional connectivity components, which is more in line with the process we want to capture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Component 1 was characterized by activations in bilateral temporal pole (Brodmann Area (BA) 38), superior temporal gyrus (STG; BA 22), supplementary motor area (SMA; BA 6)/dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC; BA 24), visual cortex (BA 17), left precentral gyrus (BA 6), bilateral insula, thalamus, and cerebellum. This network included regions described as part of the auditory network described in Ćurčić‐Blake et al ()'s review on AVHs in schizophrenia, and regions comprising the somatosensory network from Yeo et al () resting‐state fMRI parcellation analysis, and was labelled the Auditory‐Motor Network . Component 2 was characterized by activations in left posterior middle temporal gyrus (BA 21), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG; BAs 44, 45), orbitofrontal cortex (BA 47), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BA 46), and bilateral visual cortex (BAs 17, 18, 19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies examining functional brain activity during the experience of hallucinations have reported activation of language and auditory regions (e.g., Broca's area, middle/superior temporal gyri; Allen et al, ; Jardri, Pouchet, Pins, & Thomas, ), findings which are supported by network‐based connectivity analyses (Hoffman, Pittman, Constable, Bhagwagar, & Hampson, ; Thoma et al, ). Trait studies, in which functional brain activity is compared between patients with and without a history of AVHs, have also demonstrated hypercoupling/coordinated hyperactivity within auditory/language networks in AVH patients at rest (Alderson‐Day et al, ; Shinn, Baker, Cohen, & Öngür, ); however, findings of task‐based trait studies are less consistent (Ćurčić‐Blake et al, ), with some reporting hypoactivity (Kompus, Westerhausen, & Hugdahl, ), suggesting interference between AVHs and external auditory processing (Hugdahl, ), and others reporting hyperactivity in similar regions (Hoffman, Fernandez, Pittman, & Hampson, ; Lavigne et al, ). These equivocal findings are likely due to differences in the tasks and statistical analysis techniques employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%