2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-008-0603-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions of multiple spark-generated bubbles with phase differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While solid, free, elastic or composite interfaces and bubble manipulation with acoustic or shock waves might be considered as a means of control of individual jetting bubbles (Chahine 1977;Blake & Gibson 1981;Gibson & Blake 1982;Blake et al 1986;Blake, Taib & Doherty 1987;Shima et al 1989;Brujan et al 2001a,b;Robinson et al 2001;Tomita et al 2002;Wolfrum et al 2002Wolfrum et al , 2003Ohl et al 2006;Wang & Blake 2010, their use can be problematic owing to the introduction of additional constraints and the need for proper placement. Generation of a single asymmetric bubble (Lim et al 2010) or of a bubble pair (Lauterborn 1974;Lauterborn & Vogel 1984;Lauterborn & Hentschel 1985;Testud-Giovanneschi, Alloncle & Dufresne 1990;Tomita, Shima & Sato 1990;Blake et al 1993;Jungnickel & Vogel 1994;Tomita, Sato & Shima 1994;Fong et al 2009;Sankin, Yuan & Zhong 2010) with predetermined jetting behaviour by means of optical breakdown in the bulk of transparent liquids appear as a less invasive and more versatile tool for control and optimization of jet properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While solid, free, elastic or composite interfaces and bubble manipulation with acoustic or shock waves might be considered as a means of control of individual jetting bubbles (Chahine 1977;Blake & Gibson 1981;Gibson & Blake 1982;Blake et al 1986;Blake, Taib & Doherty 1987;Shima et al 1989;Brujan et al 2001a,b;Robinson et al 2001;Tomita et al 2002;Wolfrum et al 2002Wolfrum et al , 2003Ohl et al 2006;Wang & Blake 2010, their use can be problematic owing to the introduction of additional constraints and the need for proper placement. Generation of a single asymmetric bubble (Lim et al 2010) or of a bubble pair (Lauterborn 1974;Lauterborn & Vogel 1984;Lauterborn & Hentschel 1985;Testud-Giovanneschi, Alloncle & Dufresne 1990;Tomita, Shima & Sato 1990;Blake et al 1993;Jungnickel & Vogel 1994;Tomita, Sato & Shima 1994;Fong et al 2009;Sankin, Yuan & Zhong 2010) with predetermined jetting behaviour by means of optical breakdown in the bulk of transparent liquids appear as a less invasive and more versatile tool for control and optimization of jet properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of researchers have already investigated this interaction experimentally (Tomita et al 1994;Bremond et al 2006;Fong et al 2009;Sankin et al 2010;Chew et al 2011) and numerically (Blake et al 1993;Bremond et al 2006;Fong et al 2009;Hsiao et al 2013). The jetting direction is determined by the direction of the axis connecting the bubble centres, and thus can easily be adjusted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While they are traditionally associated with erosion damage [1,2], recent efforts have been aimed at medical applications, such as contrastenhancing in ultrasonic imaging [3] and shock wave lithotripsy [4]. Both spark-generated bubbles [2,[5][6][7][9][10][11] and laser-generated bubbles [1,8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] are very useful tools in experimental studies of free bubble oscillations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.3c). The push-and-pull action of the tandem bubble (more specifically of B 2 , as shown in Fig 4.3) has been coined the 'catapult' effect [138].…”
Section: Effects Of Phase Delay On Tandem Bubble Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%