2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejfs.2016.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercanine distance and bite marks analysis using metric method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although mean values of line AB and angles ABY and ABX were insignificant, mean values of line AB and angle ABX were higher in males. In contrary, Tarvadi et al evaluated that ICD as a parameter is an unreliable method for bite mark analysis [20]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although mean values of line AB and angles ABY and ABX were insignificant, mean values of line AB and angle ABX were higher in males. In contrary, Tarvadi et al evaluated that ICD as a parameter is an unreliable method for bite mark analysis [20]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…who measured the intercanine width using cusp tips. [ 24 ] He found that using intercanine width as a parameter for bite mark analysis is an unreliable method. This may be because the canine cusp tips are not as discernible in the bite mark as the outline of the canine is.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors stated that the inter-canine width is not a reliable variable for identification due to its high level of false positives (Toledo et al;Tarvadi et al, 2016). Other authors also indicate that this measurement was not good for differentiating dog breeds (Tedeschi-Oliveira et al).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the court of law can accept the bite marks analysis, scientific reliability is still up for debate (Kashyap et al, 2015;Tarvadi et al). However, Rivera-Mendoza et al found the most varied range of bitten substances, all of them belonging to sentenced cases, and many potentially treatable as legal precedents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%