2020
DOI: 10.1080/19448953.2020.1818027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interdependence between Gross Capital Formation, Public Expenditure on R&D and Innovation in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the asymmetric Frontiers in Environmental Science frontiersin.org investigation revealed positive and negative shocks of domestic investments positively linked to technological innovation in the long and short run, suggesting that the domestic capital formation induces technological innovation in BRI nations with the motivation to achieve operational and energy efficiency. Our study findings are supported by the existing literature studies (Massell, 1960;Howitt and Aghion, 1998;Satrovic et al, 2021). The multiple effects of technical innovation on the economy are readily apparent in terms such as economic growth, global competitiveness, financial systems, quality of life, and trade openness (Satrovic et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the asymmetric Frontiers in Environmental Science frontiersin.org investigation revealed positive and negative shocks of domestic investments positively linked to technological innovation in the long and short run, suggesting that the domestic capital formation induces technological innovation in BRI nations with the motivation to achieve operational and energy efficiency. Our study findings are supported by the existing literature studies (Massell, 1960;Howitt and Aghion, 1998;Satrovic et al, 2021). The multiple effects of technical innovation on the economy are readily apparent in terms such as economic growth, global competitiveness, financial systems, quality of life, and trade openness (Satrovic et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Our study findings are supported by the existing literature studies (Massell, 1960;Howitt and Aghion, 1998;Satrovic et al, 2021). The multiple effects of technical innovation on the economy are readily apparent in terms such as economic growth, global competitiveness, financial systems, quality of life, and trade openness (Satrovic et al, 2021). Regarding innovation, businesses are considered crucial factors, and the government is viewed as enhancing their ability to absorb, improve, and develop new technologies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This suggests that energy efficient products and technology improvements can help address environmental degradation. Financial inclusion can help with sustainable development efforts by increasing the adoption of such technology [ 55 ]. Financial inclusion is especially important for disadvantaged groups such as farmers and low-income families.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Service companies to become more competitive on the European market (Dobrzański et al, 2021 ; Hidalgo & D'Alvano, 2014 ; Li et al, 2018 ; Rua & Franca, 2017 ) should direct efforts towards the so-called “service innovations” related to social and business changes in companies (Gallouj et al, 2015 ), but not focus only on implementing innovations in their general understanding (Gonçalves et al, 2017 ; Jones & Basso, 2017 ). In the field of innovation-related activities, a special role in the development of competitiveness and increasing the attractiveness of the sector is assigned to expenditures on research and development (R&D), introduced innovations, but also factors independent of innovative activity, such as productivity (Satrovic et al, 2021 ). Among the above-mentioned determinants of competitiveness, the first two are particularly interesting in the context of the discussed issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%