2015
DOI: 10.1108/dpm-10-2013-0195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interdependent critical infrastructures resilience: methodology and case study

Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a coherence analysis to evaluate the resilience for a critical infrastructure (CI). This is the new way to evaluate the CI and demonstrate that the authors need to pass from the protection towards resilience. Design/methodology/approach – The authors use two approaches for this research. First is a consequence-based approach to evaluate the resilience. This approach has been used many tim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding the loss of performance associated with a disruptive event and the recovery time is essential to enhance the resilience of CIs. The loss of performance in CIs is directly linked to the type of crisis faced on a specific occasion, and the lack of communication among different organisations (Petersen et al , 2020; Robert et al , 2015). Evaluating the actual physical losses (extension of the infrastructure damage) and focusing on the potential for resilient behaviour (community’s static capacity for resilience) are two approaches suggested to measure a community’s resilience.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the loss of performance associated with a disruptive event and the recovery time is essential to enhance the resilience of CIs. The loss of performance in CIs is directly linked to the type of crisis faced on a specific occasion, and the lack of communication among different organisations (Petersen et al , 2020; Robert et al , 2015). Evaluating the actual physical losses (extension of the infrastructure damage) and focusing on the potential for resilient behaviour (community’s static capacity for resilience) are two approaches suggested to measure a community’s resilience.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%