2018
DOI: 10.1177/0162243918773446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Interested Methods” and “Versions of Pragmatism”

Abstract: Karin Knorr-Cetina (1995) once noted how a constructivist approach was in part a result of the science studies method: when studying in close detail how facts are produced in ethnographic practice, the outcome will, almost inevitably, be an analysis demonstrating the construction of facts through those nitty-gritty practices one initially had set out to study. It

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research pragmatism provides the study with a more flexible research approach to study the phenomenon (Asdal, 2018; Dittrich and Seidl, 2018). This included a sequential mixed methods approach, incorporating aspects of both quantitative and qualitative research approaches, conducted in three primary phases (Onwuegbuzie, 2012; Venkatesh et al , 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research pragmatism provides the study with a more flexible research approach to study the phenomenon (Asdal, 2018; Dittrich and Seidl, 2018). This included a sequential mixed methods approach, incorporating aspects of both quantitative and qualitative research approaches, conducted in three primary phases (Onwuegbuzie, 2012; Venkatesh et al , 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%