2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface dislocation patterns and dislocation nucleation in face-centered-cubic and body-centered-cubic bicrystal interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We focus on the PP interface because of its lower interface energy. Supporting this view, the pattern of Figure 10 A reference CDP for the PP case is constructed in Figure 10(a), where the coherency strain is partitioned between the crystals, as indicated in the rotated CDP [17,86,87] defined in Figure 10(b). The PP interface has a relative rotation of unit cells of 90°.…”
Section: Relaxed Lateral Tbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus on the PP interface because of its lower interface energy. Supporting this view, the pattern of Figure 10 A reference CDP for the PP case is constructed in Figure 10(a), where the coherency strain is partitioned between the crystals, as indicated in the rotated CDP [17,86,87] defined in Figure 10(b). The PP interface has a relative rotation of unit cells of 90°.…”
Section: Relaxed Lateral Tbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much effort has been paid recently to the nucleation of lattice dislocations at interfaces and/or grain boundaries [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Dislocation nucleation from a coherent interface is difficult since it would need to overcome a high-energy barrier associated with reducing interface coherence [27,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dislocation nucleation from a coherent interface is difficult since it would need to overcome a high-energy barrier associated with reducing interface coherence [27,30]. In contrast, interfacial dislocations in a semi-coherent interface, including misfit dislocations and interface disconnections, can act as sources for nucleation of lattice dislocations [25][26][27][28][29][30]. Using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, the nucleation of lattice dislocations has been demonstrated to be related to both the characteristics of interfacial dislocations and interface properties [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the presence of such a network, the semi-coherent has the unique ability to facilitate the transmission of lattice dislocation across the interfaces, thereby improving the ductility while maintaining the strength [20][21][22][23][24][25]. The interface dislocations and disconnections introduce strain concentrations and can act as sources for nucleation of lattice dislocations [26][27][28][29][30][31]. However, there are cases where the interface dislocations lose the privilege to nucleate lattice dislocations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%