Interferences generated on the well-being of local communities by the activity of online platforms for tourist accommodation

Martín, José María Martín; Prados-Castillo, Juan F.; Aguilera, Juan de Dios Jiménez; González, Eva Porras

doi:10.1080/09669582.2020.1861455

Cited by 19 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 72 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Evidence of mixed methods research in social impacts of tourism research is highlighted through the review of articles employing such a design within the leading tourism journals between 1998 and 2019 (Molina-Azor ın & Font, 2016;Truong et al, 2020) as well as throughout the work within this special issue (Stylidis & Terzidou, 2021, and Mart ın-Mart ın et al, 2020. From a pragmatic standpoint, the methods one employs are largely contingent upon whether the intent of the research is on theoretical development or theoretical testing.…”

Section: Highlighting Methodological Advancements In Assessing Social...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Methodological and theoretical advancements in social impacts of tourism research

Woosnam

Ribeiro

2022

Journal of Sustainable Tourism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This lead article introduces the double special issue dedicated to methodological and theoretical advancements in social impacts of tourism research. We begin by providing an overview of five key developmental stages of research within this area: Definitions, typologies, and conceptual model development; the advent of case study-based, atheoretical empirical inquiry; scale design, development, and testing; further scale development/refinement and theoretical application; and theoretical model development and testing. Brief evolutionary histories of the methodological and theoretical advancements of research dedicated to social impacts of tourism are then discussed. This includes a review of the most pertinent predictor variables (along with a visual display of each and key studies) in explaining residents' perceptions of social impacts of tourism and a thorough review of most frequently used theoretical frameworks. Following this, brief synopses of the articles are provided along with key themes (e.g. resident-tourist relationships, social impacts and residents' attitudes, residents' empowerment, overtourism, and methodologies) and salient points of each work. In closing, we suggest numerous lines of inquiry that will continue to advance research into social impacts of tourism. Though these studies were undertaken prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, we emphasize that future work should be designed with the pandemic in mind.

show abstract

Section: Highlighting Methodological Advancements In Assessing Social...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Methodological and theoretical advancements in social impacts of tourism research

Woosnam

Ribeiro

2022

Journal of Sustainable Tourism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Residents in the community are the neighborhoods of the P2P accommodation customers. Neighbors' feedback and reactions are important to the well-being of P2P accommodation customers (Martín-Martín et al, 2020). During COVID-19, many residents have become reluctant to share public spaces with unfamiliar customers of P2P accommodations to avoid the risk of affection (Braje et al, 2022).…”

Section: Complete Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Antecedents and intervention mechanisms of institutional distrust of P2P accommodations during COVID-19 in China

Yang

2022

IJCHM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose COVID-19 affects the peer-to-peer (P2P) accommodation industry. With regard to prospect theory, individuals’ negative emotions, such as institutional distrust, are easily evoked and impede consumption intention in an environment of permeating uncertainty and risks. While existing research indicates the negative effects of institutional distrust, scant research has explored its antecedents and intervention mechanisms. This study thus aims to unveil the influencing factors and explore mitigating mechanisms of customers’ institutional distrust of P2P accommodations. Design/methodology/approach Online reviews data were used to identify the underlying critical issues. The authors developed a model to depict how institutional distrust is formed under the boundary condition of subjective norm by the results. The model was verified using a questionnaire survey. Finally, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted to ensure its robustness. Findings The external environment and internal platform effectiveness are two critical aspects affecting institutional distrust of P2P accommodations. The external environment influences institutional distrust through perceived threat, explaining the formation mechanism of customers’ institutional distrust through customers’ internal psychology. Furthermore, the authors found subjective norm moderating the effect of perceived threat on customers’ institutional distrust. Research limitations/implications This is one of the first studies, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to explore institutional distrust of P2P accommodations after COVID-19. The finding contributes to studies on P2P accommodation by uncovering the contingent role of subjective norm in influencing customers’ institutional distrust. Originality/value This is a pioneering study that explores the antecedents and mitigating mechanisms of institutional distrust of P2P accommodations during the new normal of COVID-19.

show abstract

“…The loss of the housing stock (permanent units and long-term rentals) to short-term rentals has also been discussed [100]. This could, in turn, negatively impact social cohesion in neighbourhoods [101]. As a result, the inclusiveness of tourism is also debated [102].…”

Section: Liveability Impacts and Framingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impacts of the Sharing Economy on Urban Sustainability: The Perceptions of Municipal Governments and Sharing Organisations

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

By changing the institutionalised practices associated with resource distribution, the sharing economy could support sustainable urban transformations. However, its impacts on urban sustainability are unknown and contested, and key actors hold different perceptions about them. Understanding how they frame these impacts could help solve conflicts and outline what can be done to influence the development of the sharing economy in a way that fosters urban sustainability. This study explores the diversity of these frames across actors (sharing economy organisations and municipalities), segments (accommodation, bicycle, and car sharing), and cities (Amsterdam and Toronto). A framework of the impacts on urban sustainability was developed following a systematic literature review. This then guided the analysis of secondary data and 51 interviews with key actors. Results show that accommodation sharing is framed most negatively due to its impact on urban liveability. Bicycle sharing is surrounded by less conflict. Still, in Amsterdam, which has a well-functioning bicycle infrastructure, it is viewed less positively than in Toronto. Car sharing is the most positively framed segment in Amsterdam as its potentials to lower emissions align with municipal sustainability agendas. Practical insights for negotiations between sharing economy organisations and municipalities to advance urban sustainability are proposed.

show abstract

Interferences generated on the well-being of local communities by the activity of online platforms for tourist accommodation

Cited by 19 publications

References 72 publications

Methodological and theoretical advancements in social impacts of tourism research

Methodological and theoretical advancements in social impacts of tourism research

Antecedents and intervention mechanisms of institutional distrust of P2P accommodations during COVID-19 in China

Impacts of the Sharing Economy on Urban Sustainability: The Perceptions of Municipal Governments and Sharing Organisations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About